...which is why today's sponsor is NordVPN!
(don't actually use NV there are much better options, this was for comedic effect)
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
639 points (98.8% liked)
Mildly Interesting
23166 readers
468 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What's wrong with Nord?
Overall the marketing is dishonest/over promises and there's some previous lack of transparency with data breaches along with being closed source. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NordVPN#Criticism
There's just better options: https://thatoneprivacysite.xyz/
*Builds privacy site*
*Embeds Google sheet*
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The Big Brother energy of that "We Can See You" eye in the middle is pretty high.
Yeah college networks are one of the biggest ones I would not trust unless I had a VPN going. Average computing? Perfectly fine. Naughty things? VPN up
If you don't use the VPN for normal things then you leave yourself open to indentification by correlation. It's the same rule for naive Tor users. The more normal and distributed it appears in traffic, the harder it is to correlate other pieces of data they they already have access to.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Friendly reminder that the panopticon we live under today was considered horrifying a hundred years ago
It's still horrifying today. We're just powerless to stop it.
Or even 25 years ago! They (and in many cases we) tried to warn them. Turns out the other "they" are happy to give it away for AI slop videos.
That's not when they gave it away. It was well and truly gone 24 years ago lest terrorists win
More reason to use a VPN.
They're not trying to actually stop you; they're trying to keep the lawyers at bay.
load more comments
(7 replies)
You say you can tell what I'm downloading? Mullvad says otherwise.
You can still download a car
But I would never do that of course. I would however shit in a policemans helmet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALZZx1xmAzg (IT Crowd)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Sounds like a bunch of us should put up seeds with titles like "This (1947) It's A Wonderful Life (Public Domain) is better than (2025) Fantastic Four"
load more comments
(1 replies)
They're just trying not to lose their internet service provider probably. ISP's are even starting to threaten their residential and commercial customers alike because they can't afford the lawsuits so network tech's are starting to turn in individuals about compliance and such.
Yeah, this is just a student-run association running it, providing connection from university's upstream ISP which apparently is easy to upset.
I posted this because I actually find this nice, as it doesn't fully block torrents, but just specific ones, and they also make that clear. They could just block torrents and stay safe.
Func fact: Some dorm rooms apparently actually have 2.5Gbit. I've seen the speed test. Of course, you'll need a compatible network card. Most have "only" a gigabit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Speaking of which, I gave up on torrents a couple of years ago and switched to direct downloads. Not only is it much faster due to not having to rely on seeds, turns out that ISPs don't actually care if you download pirated content. Distributing it is where they get you.
This is going to depend on the country that you're in. Germany for example is pretty notorious for also going after the small fries.
Isn't it harder to find direct downloads? Or am I just stuck in the past on the bay?
load more comments
(6 replies)
Why would anyone, anywhere block torrenting? There is nothing illegal about it.
Coming from an IT perspective, I can tell you 100% that torrenting on a network can cause a bottleneck with the amount of bandwidth that it often can take especially if it's not set up properly. Several years ago I remember working in a corporate network and we had our internet slow down to a near crawl because one person decided they wanted to torrent a movie during one of our busiest seasons. Let's just say we're able to track them down and they got fired on the spot.
load more comments
(14 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Legal game updates as torrents? Is that a thing?
Humble Bundle distributes their DRM-free games and other content via BitTorrent.
I know WoW used bittorrent for game updates, it was built in and was the "standard" download mechanism.
https://worldofwarcraft.fandom.com/et/wiki/Blizzard_Downloader
I'm sure it's far from the only game that did.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Even Windows Update has a peer-to-peer option.
load more comments
(6 replies)
At least theyre making the distinction
Policing this crap isn't trivial and not worth the effort.
We just gave up and block 100% of all P2P traffic on both our university wireless and student wired networks.
load more comments
(12 replies)
debrid services for the win! just let someone else torrent it for you, and download it from them.
AllDebrid costs €3 a month and saves you any legal headaches.
load more comments
(8 replies)
At least it's allowed, when I was in college they didn't allow any torrent traffic at all. They had also banned pings specifically, and threatened to shut off my internet if I didn't stop trying to send pings, which apparently my torrent client was doing automatically.
At least it’s allowed
That was my point. It being allowed rather than "we received 2 not nice letters, say goodbye to that entire protocol" as usual.
If you get the torrent from a site using HTTPS and get the data only from encrypted peers is it even possible to tell what people are downloading?
Not from monitoring on the network
But if one of those peers is a snitch then you have a potential issue
load more comments
(3 replies)
me with my vpn
view more: next ›