this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
1648 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

19635 readers
1629 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip 16 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean I sold 4 years of my life to the military to not have to take loans out, so I get the gut reaction

The main cause of the student loan issue is the commodification of education. Everyone wanted to go to college and at first it was optional but then as more people did it it became a requirement, then they realized they can charge more and more for education that is worse and worse because a good chunk of people dont actually want to learn / be there. They're just there for the paper that'll let them get jobs and not be unemployed, or even just to say that they went.

I look around and people are playing damn Pokémon Showdown in class, there was that one scandal of an influencer girl who was the daughter of someone important that bought her admission to Stanford(?) and would stream literally about how she didn't care about education she just wanted the college experience.

Hot take: Not everyone should be going to college, High School should just prepare people better. Even if we forgive all loans right now it doesn't fix the issue. Instead of your problem it will just be your kids' problem

[–] PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

While I agree in theory, I'm not really sure there's much that can be done in practice. The genie is out of the bottle here: jobs want the paper, so people get the paper, leading to jobs expecting people to have the paper. An employer is unlikely to deliberately "lower their standards" (in their view) if the pool of potential employees with a degree is large enough for their needs already. Since you can't legislate that employers are not allowed to require a degree, and you can't expect people to not get a degree and sacrifice their own potential future to break that cycle, we're kind of at an impasse.

That's why the only way forward that anyone's figured out so far is government funded higher education.

Edit:typos

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It also reinforces the class system. 'elite' employers won't even look at you if you don't come from an ivy or a top 5/10 school.

and there are fewer and fewer of these 'elite' jobs to go around, hence the paranoia among the upper middle classes that their children will have zero future if they don't get into an ivy.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Trades are a good option, but how long before plumbing drones are crawling through the sewers?

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

how long before plumbing drones are crawling through the sewers

That would be lit

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

What makes you think they aren't already?

[–] LaterRedditor@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Do we all think loan forgiveness is the cure for student loans?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Not at all, but loan forgiveness wasn't mentioned in the comic. It's just putting a bandaid on a capitalized educational system that should not be for making money but rather a societal investment into our betterment. Id keep my loans I have left and vote for free education any day of the week if we had the option. (Of course I wouldn't say no to both) But I think some people were trying to use loan forgiveness to breach the doors of free education.

[–] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 213 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Was it also sponsored by the "I want my kids to have a better life than me" crew who then complains about kids having it too easy these days?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I want them to have it better and easier. But an easier life, not just an easy childhood that doesn't prepare them for their inevitable crushing adulthood.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I want the opposite tbh, kids just don't appreciate it. Send them to the mines first, and then give them an easy adulthood.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As a Gen-X, if I was a kid these days I'd be pissed too. It seems as much grief as they're given by adults, they understand early on they've been given the worst hand.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I totally agree with this. If someone is opposed to student loan forgiveness because they had to pay theirs off, that person sucks. But if that person thinks maybe they should get a portion of their payments back too, and not as part of opposition, then I am sympathetic.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

if that person thinks maybe they should get a portion of their payments back too

I think every one of them assumes they will never get a cent of that money back. They do live in America, after all, the land of "fuck you; got mine."

Change the legislation to give every living person back every cent they ever paid towards student loans, and many opinions would change.

The Republican party would still be completely against it though, so we'd still have millions of boot lickers out there arguing to hurt their own financial situation in order to please their superiors.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The goverment paying off student loans is like bucketing water out of your boat and ignoring the hole. Like sure, its gonna keep some people afloat for a little longer but the issue hasn't really been addressed, the problem is still there and the cycle remains a perpetual shit storm. The cost of education is preposterous, the people taking these loans dont have jobs to support paying it back, and most of them are too young to have the experience informing them of what a monumental undertaking paying it back will be. If they tried to get the same loan for a house or business they would be denied. There are so many issues to tackle but paying off the loans rewards the groups who created the problem in the first place. It incentivizes them to continue the foul play and prey upon vulnerable youth. Without some systematic reform accompanying the loan payoffs to ensure this doesn't continue we will end up in the same situation over and over again.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (20 children)

While I fully agree the issue is the underlying problem... that is some All Lives Matter shit.

Because basically anyone who brings that up as an excuse to not wipe the slate clean are in that same "We need to think really hard about how we do this and not do anything for another 30 years". Same as most "Banning guns won't stop gun violence" people. It is a bad faith argument that boils down to insisting that the perfect MUST be the enemy of the good.

[–] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Im not saying we shouldn't pay off the loans or delay doing so. I'm saying that alone will not solve the problem. We must do both. I never hear discussion on that second part. Ignoring it is foolish.

And yes, the snails pace at which reform would occur is infuriating. It shouldn't take 30 years because some asshats will continue to argue in the nature of "how dare we hurt these businesses?!" while people continue to suffer. It sucks that it likely will, but if we dont start now it will never happen instead of eventually.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

For me, I do kind of think that if someone paid and then forgiveness happened, they ought to be at least partially compensated if they have any history of being low income. They could have put their loan payments into something else but they didn't so they'd kind of end up screwed over by their slavishly responsible bill paying.

That said: its stupid to not want broad student loan forgiveness because the student loan crisis is literally damaging the economy. Its hurting everyone, even people who already paid their loans off.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty much. It would be more broadly acceptable if it was like 'if you had student loans in the past decade you get a $5000 tax credit'. Maybe more if your reported income for the past 10 years was below a certain threshold.

That would benefit everyone, including those who paid off their loans and they could then tax that money from the tax credit and spend it elsewhere.

This type of thing was huge beneficial for child care too. The Child Care Tax Credits during the pandemic were a huge benefit and halved the child poverty rate. It's sheer stupidity they were cancelled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't need to cure cancer, you need to be able to prevent it in the first place.

Ofc this is following the metaphor, for actual cancer you need both.

For student loans you need to fix the system, higher education in Europe is free, but it really isn't, you pay for your education over your lifetime by earning more money with your higher education and thus paying more in taxes and social security.

Ofc it's not a perfect system, but much better than having young idiots be purposely exposed to predatory lending.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm somewhat torn on this:

Yes, I totally agree that federal loans should be forgiven even if someone pays theirs off.

Private loans though? Not so much. That's basically the same as a mortgage from a bank. Or a car loan even. That money ultimately ends up in the borrower's possession after the school balance is paid. That? I am not so willing to share the cost of.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Debt itself has a history of forgiveness. Western Societies could benefit from being more forgiving imo. 30% apr loans should absolutely be illegal, but thats a lot of credit debt today.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

30% apr loans should absolutely be illegal

Are you talking of a specific instance? Because, we do have anti-usery laws.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 11 hours ago

My first car loan had a 26% interest rate. Over that 36 month loan I would have literally paid over twice the total value of the loan if I didn't refinance it after 6 months.

I learned a lot through the mistakes I made that day and have endeavored to not repeat any of those mistakes (and so far I haven't!)

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

I, somewhat, feel you. My hang up is federal loans are often s pittance

Maybe my FAFSA has the wrong code(at this point, for my oldest). Maybe I should have lied about my assets? I haven't done my research, but it did not seem like my lack of home or non-beater factor in

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah I don't think this covers the situation as much as it's a nice feel good story.

Imagine for a second you are relatively poor, you go to a state school or community college in order to afford it. You have loans, but they are small.

Now imagine you're upper middle class, you go to a private or out of state school and take loans out for a much much larger amount than the other person, with the expectation that you're getting more value for your money (let's ignore the labyrinth there for a second -- this is something many people believe and believing it, for some, makes it true).

Now, both loans are forgiven

Youve succeeded in making the rich richer, giving them both the higher valued education and all of their money back.

Or imagine you're that poor student but you're smart: you got a grant or scholarship making your loans nonexistent, but only if you go to the state school.

Once again, forgiving loans makes the already wealthy person significantly more wealthy and does nothing to benefit the poorer person.

Yes, of course, there's a wide range of reasons a person might go down either route, and I'm absolutely certain there are many millions of people who have gotten loans way above their wealth in order to go to a better school and jump out of poverty (or whatever). This comic ignores the nuance.

In the cancer analogy, this would be a poor person dying or otherwise experiencing terrible health problems because they couldn't get the care they needed, then when a cure is developed, only administering it to the people who could afford care to begin with (ie american health care)

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

This is a great point. And yes, the system typically always rewards the rich far more than the poor.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If this is a one-time event it's hardly the solution to the problem. Education should be free or close to free in general.

If that's the case, things suddenly look different. Even only if e.g. state schools are free.

In my country the tuition fee for a state university is around €30 per semester, and that doesn't even go to the university but to fund the student governing body (not sure what's the right translation for the term).

This means, that everyone can get a quality education even if they are poor. In fact, most people I went to university with funded their flat/student accomodation and food with a part-time job while going to university. No debts or financial assistance needed.

This doesn't cover private universities, but (a) the difference in quality and reputation isn't relevant and (b) free public universities means that private universities are also somewhat price capped if they want to stay competitive.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Of course, but that's never been a serious proposal in this country so I wasn't responding to it.

It's feasible to do this today in the US at some schools, but your parents have to really push you to get a lot of scholarships. It's not common.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I paid off my student loans at the beginning of this month. it took me 16 years and like $65,000, right? If someone else comes in behind me, goes through the same shit that I went through, and then gets their loan forgiven or paid off in a couple of years?

Then I'm happy for them. Good for them, their life is gonna be so much easier without that burden over their head, and happier people means I get to live in a happier society, which means that I get to be happier too.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That mindset sure is a great way to make sure nothing ever gets better for anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›