this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
1711 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

19651 readers
1580 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I don't feel like the comparison works, because we don't know a clear cure for cancer right now, but loan forgiveness is something we can technically do just fine (it's entirely human made after all)

I don't think you can feel unfairness about something not happening that, to our current knowledge, is not possible. You can feel a bit unfairness if something that might as well have helped you, won't be done for you... For no clear reason.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I admit I kinda feel this way about Ozempic after having to fight for years to finally get into better shape.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ValarieLenin@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Capitalism is cancer, prove me wrong.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

When the makers of a game don’t setup rules or enforce them, then the game can suck because of how unbalanced it can get.

The issue at the end of the day is with the game makers (politicians) not making the game fair and fun. Elements could be added to balance the game, such as cash being distributed each time you pass GO (a monthly Universal Basic Income[UBI]) and setting lower costs the on the property you want to rent. More properties could even be added to the board to help lower the cost of owning a property.

The game in theory could have some interesting elements, such as innovation and competition fueling creativity. But when the game makers totally removed themselves from a judging role, those interesting features completely disappeared due to the big players being allowed to swallow up all the competition.

The big players’ greed also fuels the game to be worse for everyone, including themselves. Incentives to create the lowest priced products sounds great on paper. However, when the greed from the big players has caused the majority of players to not be able to afford even their cheapest products, then suddenly those big players start cutting corners. More and more. Until they are providing their customers with actual garbage and they might even call it ‘food’ too!

Contrast this with if people were actually getting a base amount of money (thanks to UBI) and those same people could afford to not just have the worst/cheapest versions of everything. Suddenly, the scale can be flipped to be a race geared around providing the best and highest quality goods and services. Rules can be enforced to punish wasteful, unsustainable, and unethical business practices as well, since people aren’t dependent on everything being a race to the bottom.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Makes sense. It's like, if you think about it, the last three rounds of Monopoly, when one person clearly has all of the property and everyone else is just playing and playing, waiting to eventually go bankrupt, is the worst part of the entire game, by far.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›