One thing I'll say is that I prefer gates or portals to "Teleporters" for the obvious "it actually kills you" thing
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
FTL travel in the series of book "the interdependency" is one of the major plot devices, so it's one of those that marked me the most.
Without going into spoilers: FTL is limited to using a natural phenomenon that are pretty much akin to space-rivers, so humanity has no power onto what systems are connected to one another.
As rivers do, those "currents" can also shift and have done so in the past: the place where the books happen are completely cut off from earth since pretty much forever, for example.
I prefer the STL in Card's Ender's Game series. They asymptotically approach the speed of light so the passengers only have several weeks pass when travelling to far flung locations but the universe around them experiences a normal passage of time which may be tens of years. This has really big implications on the plots in several stories.
They do have an ansible communications system that does allow instantaneous communication over astronomical distances.
CJ Cherryh and Joel Sheperd use basically the same system in their universes (Sheperd admitted he basically adopted CJ’s almost verbatim).
Ships can travel FTL transitioning into another plane of existence (to say it in an uncomplicated way), but to do so they must first acquire a speed very close to c. And when they transition back to the regular space they do it at transluminic velocity, that they must shred off pulsing their hyperdrives before coming down to ‘maneouvring’ speeds.
All of this makes for interesting tactical situations in the intent of an interstellar conflict.
I love how in Shepherd’s universe gravity is an actual issue and a major plot point in many cases
Silfen Paths from Judas Unchained. Aliens called Silfen walked from planet to planet directly via actual forest paths. Everything gets wonky time wise when your on one so you might emerge 100 years later. The technology itself is sentient and not maintained. The Silfen who lost interest long ago are asked how they manage the paths. They say they just let them do what they want. At least one path exists to/from Earth. But humans are boring and make things boring, so the aliens avoid Earth.
So if you're on a walk and you get lost you may be walking to another planet.
Not ftl but I really like cryo sleep themes. Someone wakes up 100+ years later and the world is post apocalyptic. James axlers deathlands audio books, alien, some obscure video games.
The game Outer Worlds uses this as a main plot device.
Star Control had an interesting take on it, where you're able to jump between eiffererent "levels" of space if you have something that can induce the right field and at the right level of power. Sort of like jumping between electron shells or something.
But you can jump from normal space, to hyperspace on top of that, to quasispace on top of that. And maybe others above (and below). Traveling a certain distance in each space allows you to travel an exponentially larger amount of distance in the lower space.
So you induce a field, pop up to hyperspace, move at less than FTL (as relative to hyperspace), then fall back to regular space.
No mention of Futurama? Screw moving the ship, just move the universe around it!
The Hyperspace Gates in Cowboy Bebop always seemed to be pretty plausible. They didn't explain all the science behind them, but there was enough to show that the was science behind it, and it had been commercialized enough that people had a basic understanding of them.
I wouldn't say it was my favourite FTL but it has some interesting implications.
The artificial wormholes of The Algebraist by Ian Banks. I can't say too much if you haven't already read it, but it's artificial wormholes that have to be transported sublight.
All the new wormholes are of course lovely and high capacity, but much of the network is still the original tiny little ones first installed. So your military at least uses kilometer long needle ships that can fit through these small points.
Think fitting an aircraft carrier through a Stargate.
The one where humans discover a way to "skip" through space in jumps – which shouldn't be possible and puts a strain on the traveler – until they discover the real deal from aliens.
Aside from that, the more common type with beacons or gates.
As long as it's got "dat woosh", I'll love it.
Elite Dangerous, Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, and Battletech are my favorites, though.
FRIENDSHIP DRIVE CHARGING BABY!
"Warning! Hyperspace conduit unstable!"
Uh oh.
I like how Stellaris does hyperdrive; certain systems are connected by hyperplanes. Presumably something "man-made" in those systems generates the field and "throws" the ship to the next system.
Similar to Mass Effect except that whereas in Mass Effect, one generator can connect to any other, in Stellaris each one only goes between two points, like a subway.
One of my favourite upgrades in stellaris is the jump drive, because a 120 stop trip to go what is barely above me is rough and id rather just hop the gap.
I like the kind where they didn't try to explain it. Trying to show how they make their sausage never works out well. I can suspend disbelief for FTL but not for their stupid explanations
Macguffin it just enough to be maybe plausable, give it enough rules to make it interesting, be consistent and then shut the fuck up about it.
My favourite one is Red Dwarf when they see the future. Requires a fair amount of "dont think about it" but its still a great plot.
Singularity Sky by Charles Stross. It deals heavily with causality and "light cones." There's some super advanced entity in the universe that enforces a ban on causality-breaking FTL, so it's not possible for anything to mess with the entity's development, iirc.
Stross's Neptune Brood also has some interesting stuff about FTL economics. It's somewhat of a satire on cryptocurrency, NFTs, and marketization in general.
So is there no FTL, or just some kind of heavy restriction on FTL? Any FTL will break causality in some frame of reference, using real world physics.
Here's how I remember it, could be wrong, been a long time. The super advanced entity, the Eschaton, descends from humans in the future. Any FTL travel that would break causality within the Eschaton's historical light cone is banned; I.e. anything that could interfere with the Eschaton's development. Human civilizations have causality-safe jump drives that navigate in ways that avoid causality violations within the Eschaton's historical light cone.
I wouldn't call it a satire; it's more a thought exercise on how to make galactic colonization economically viable. The cost involved in setting up a colony that's tens or hundreds of light years away would be astronomical, and the return on investment would take so long that it's simply not reasonable under any current economic system. Right now we talk about how it would be hard to colonize Mars, and that's only about nine months of travel, and not at anything close to relativistic speeds.
Yeah, some of it felt a little tongue in cheek though. Like people having their own reputation markets where everyone could buy/sell shares on others reputation.
The Infinite Probability Drive from Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
It's the Infinite Improbability Drive though, not Probability, that makes no sense :)
My bad 😥
Ha, good choice. After all these years it's still among the more creative and fun.
The warp from warhammer 40k.
Just because of how grim dark and batshit it all is.
Also as shown in the prequel movie, Event Horizon.
I liked the wormholes from the Bobbyverse. You had instantaneous travel across interstellar distances but you had to get there via slower than light speed first. So no matter how technologically advanced you became your interstellar civilisation still grew at a rate of one or two systems per decade.
Came here to say this, glad to see Bobiverse getting rep ❤️
in mass effect, the core can manipulate the mass of a surrounding ship, making lightspeed travel possible.
Which wouldn't work realistically, because it would tear the ship and crew appart.
tbf i don't think any of these would