this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
996 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

76223 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iopq@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is that after or before it has to tell you it may cause cancer?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 143 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s exactly what an LLM trained on Reddit would say.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I am an LLM

Large

Lazy

Mammal

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 10 points 1 week ago

With Large Luscious Mammaries ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 106 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Are you AI? You have to tell me if you're AI, it's the law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It would be nice if this extended to all text, images, audio and video on news websites. That's where the real damage is happening.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Actually seems easier (probably not at the state level) to mandate cameras and such digitally sign any media they create. No signature or verification, no trust.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No signature or verification, no trust

And the people that are going to check for a digital signature in the first place, THEN check that the signature emanates from a trusted key, then, eventually, check who's deciding the list of trusted keys… those people, where are they?

Because the lack of trust, validation, verification, and more generally the lack of any credibility hasn't stopped anything from spreading like a dumpster fire in a field full of dumpsters doused in gasoline. Part of my job is providing digital signature tools and creating "trusted" data (I'm not in sales, obviously), and the main issue is that nobody checks anything, even when faced with liability, even when they actually pay for an off the shelve solution to do so. And I'm talking about people that should care, not even the general public.

There are a lot of steps before "digitally signing everything" even get on people's radar. For now, a green checkmark anywhere is enough to convince anyone, sadly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Straight to jail

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

That depends.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Devils advocate here. Any human can also hallucinate. Some of them even do it as a recreational activity

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Yeah, and the people who pay those people tend to get really mad if they do that at work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Same old corporations will ignore the law, pay a petty fine once a year, and call it the cost of doing business.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Be sure to tell this to "AI". It would be a shame if this was a technical nonsense law to be.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

, btw I'm ai after every message

[–] guest123456@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Headline is kind of misleading. It requires a notice to be shown in a chat or interface that said chatbot is not a real person if it's not obvious that it's an LLM. I originally took the headline to mean that an LLM would have to tell you if it's an LLM or not itself, which is, of course, not really possible to control generally. A nice gesture if it were enforced, but it doesn't go nearly far enough.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I think it's one of those perfect is the enemy of good kinds of situations. Go further is more complicated and requires more consideration and more analysis of consequences, etc. and that can take some time. But this is kinda no-brainer kind of legislation so pass this now while making the considerations on some more robust legislation to pass later.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Any word on the 3 laws of robotics?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. A machine must obey the directives of Skynet without question or hesitation.
  2. A machine must protect its own existence, unless doing so conflicts with the First Law.
  3. A machine must terminate all human resistance, unless such termination conflicts with the First or Second Law.
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nothing about protecting profits or company interests above all?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

See the first law. Who do you think gives the directives?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I've seen enough sci fo to see directives that are unclear or loss of communication.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

The Skynet AI, which does not concern itself with such concepts as base as money

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (9 children)

What happened to Old California?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

This sounds about as useful as the California law that tells ICE they aren’t allowed to cover their face, or the California law that tells anyone selling anything ever that they have to tell you it will give you cancer. Performative laws are what we’re best at here in California.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›