this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
298 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

2729 readers
228 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am sure this article has been shared before, however I wanted to have a look at this topic.
The articles short summary is this:

All 25 car brands we researched earned our *Privacy Not Included warning label – making cars the worst category of products that we have ever reviewed

I am currently driving a 2014 Ford Fiesta which just has a radio with a CD player and Bluetooth. I do not need more than that in a car.

The reason I am looking at all is that that the Fiesta does not belong to me and the friend owning it will be moving out in a bit, so I kinda need another one.

There seems to be one brand that is not as bad as the other ones (but still bad): Renault; mozilla's review...
Maybe I will have a look at their cars.

What do you guys think? Stick to older used cars and not use an EV or look at which of the manufacturers have the least bad privacy policy?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agegamon@beehaw.org 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (19 children)

I bought a used Chevy bolt EV, for now I've pulled the onstar system fuse which kills the telemetry and GPS+cell antenna. No tracking with no power, it's my car and my battery so I decide what gets my power.

I'm not interested in letting any of these companies screw me over behind my back regardless of who is "less evil," but I've gotten so used to the convenience of EVs that I won't do without one.

I use my phone for navigation and music/podcasts and that still works just fine.

Might at some point look at a more sophisticated way of doing this like removing just the onstar module or terminating its antenna, but for now it's fine.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

What do you guys think? Stick to older used cars and not use an EV or look at which of the manufacturers have the least bad privacy policy?

Stick to older cars. Learn the way of the wrench. End.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Automated license plate readers (both fixed abd mobile) means old cars are tracked as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The stupidest part of this whole "always connected" BS is it doesn't do anything for the car. I pulled and partially rebuilt the engine in my 2020 gmc and those stupid emails about the car's health didn't even notice. It keeps sending them to me regardless of me not paying for on star or if the engine is sitting in the garage. Made me want to find the antennae and disconnect it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

List of automotive connectivity module providers: https://www.evbusiness.net/ev-directory/automotive-lte-5g-module-manufacturers/

Find which one your car has. Then see if you can find a repair manual with schematics. Find where the cell antenna connects. Non-destructively disconnect it. This way your telematics won't be affected. It will just look like you're always in a cell dead-zone.

Edit: don't do this if it's a lease, a rental, or there's a loan on the vehicle. If you own it outright and it doesn't void the warranty, go nuts.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I don't own a car and am not a fan of most modern "features", but, I must say, I'm quite fond of adaptive cruise control. Setting a follow distance and just cruising for long drives is far better than pumping the brakes every 5 minutes for folks mucking up passing lanes or trucks attempting to overtake on lane-limited roadways. I bet if everyone used it, traffic snakes wouldn't be such a nuisance.

I'd rather never own a car, but if I needed one, I'd be hard pressed to sacrifice privacy for that sweet adaptive cruise. Of course, network connectivity isn't required, so perhaps there will eventually be options.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] artifex@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I had been actively looking forward to the Slate truck (even though I don't want a truck) for this reason - an EV with modern drivetrain but no BS electronics or telemetry. Unfortunately the price has gone from about $20K - a price appropriate for it's minimalist approach - to "below $30K" and it's not due out for another year, so who knows how it will pan out.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Seeing how Bezos is involved it will start small and then jack up the prices as demand for it goes up. Probably even last minute fees for those on waiting lists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

I have a 2014 Chevy volt. Not a full EV, but used ones are affordable and the 3g cell modem no longer works.

We get 30-38 miles per charge depending on the outside temperature which covers most of our day to day driving. It will charge from a regular wall outlet (120v at 8 amps) in 12 hours. The ICE engine gets an oil change every 2 years since it gets rarely used.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I’m confused here, if cars are not connected to the internet how else are they broadcasting the data? Or is it collected during maintenance and if so what do mechanics care about your sexual activity.

Edit: Reading through the comments there are 3G/4G/LTE/5G bands in the cars? Who is paying for the cellular service then?


I don’t drive nor care about cars so this isn’t my wheelhouse obviously.

I pay for a 5g wireless number from AT&T. Not sure exactly what my Mustang is selling. But I do get warnings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

We need more development of open source cars

[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'd love this, but I doubt that it is ever going to happen. Open-Source-Hardware is not as widely spread as open source software which is also still a niche. The big difference is that you can easily develop OSS on your own in your free time, but with hardware its a lot more difficult. And then think of all the parts necessary to build a car and then again all the certifications to actually get it on the street and after that the question of liability in case of accidents....

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the real obstacle isn't even the regulations but the safety systems. The various US DMVs can comprehend things like scratch-built or kit cars, but the level of engineering to make a thing that can even sometimes decelerate a person from like 60 to 0 without killing them more with exploding airbags is several levels above that required to make a thing with wheels that drives forward.

So you can build and probably even drive a car from plans you got off Github, but if you crash it it will kill you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Interesting point you bring up.

The inner workings and overall principles of the internal combustion engine are well-documented. There are also open-source engine controllers - Speeduino comes to mind. Electric motors and their controllers are also well-documented.

People build kit cars all the time, enough that many U.S. states actually have specific standards that a kit car must meet in order to be road legal; hilariously, these standards are often far lower than vehicles manufactured by an OEM.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

We don't need a foss ice to have open source cars. Even setting ice aside, as long as the BOM includes easy to find, off the shelf components, its still a Foss project

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

Fun fact, French auto brands are defacto banned in the US. You can’t insure them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

FWIW I did both a GDPR request and a Lexus Nexus data request on both of my Mercedes and they had zero info on me. My buddy did the same and same results. I’m not sure they are collecting any data even though they say they may, or they’re actually honoring the opt out setting. Either way I’m not worried about my Mercedes cars. My brother requested his data and his Toyota and Lexus had a LOT of info on him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›