this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42636 readers
434 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chalk another one up for Big Brother. I wonder if this will apply to/be enforced on FDroid and Obtainium?

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 53 points 3 days ago

The "please tread on me harder" state.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The text of the new Texas law is here.

I wonder if this will apply to/be enforced on FDroid and Obtainium?

copying my comment from another thread:

"App store" means a publicly available Internet website, software application, or other electronic service that distributes software applications from the owner or developer of a software application to the user of a mobile device.

This sounds like it could apply not only to F-Droid but also to any website distributing APKs, and actually, every other software distribution sysem too (eg, linux distros...) which include software which could be run on a "mobile device" (the definition of which also can be read as including a laptop).

otoh i think they might have made a mistake and left a loophole; all of the requirements seem to depend on an age verification "under Section 121.021" and Section 121.021 says:

When an individual in this state creates an account with an app store, the owner of the app store shall use a commercially reasonable method of verification to verify the individual's age category

I'm not a lawyer but I don't see how this imposes any requirements on "app stores" which simply don't have any account mechanism to begin with :)

"Roll Safe" meme (Kayode Ewumi tapping his finger on his head), no text

(Not to say that this isn't still immediately super harmful for the majority of the people who get their apps from Google and Apple...)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Thank you for researching that

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right, so basically they'll have a database of who has (had) what app, when, and where...

Which could include apps like Grindr (way to target the LGBT community), or like Signal (way to target Journalists, activists, and other privacy minded people). You can find out a lot about someone's app choices and in a state like Texas, which is conservative and authoritarian, that can be used to go after certain demographics.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Who is "they"? Google/Apple? Yes. But that's not really anything new. Texas? I don't think so.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Obtainium no because it's a github parser and I highly doubt they'll implement it on the downloader.

F-Droid and other non-free anpp stores sure.

Accrescent may have to leave Texas, with all that privacy/security jaff.

That works until Google will lock down the APK installer for "unverified" apps

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

owning them libs