No shit about staying silent. Even the media is silent. The only references I can find in my news feed regarding the No Kings rallies, is local reports from small local stations. Things like this make it obvious which side the mass media is on.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I think AP covered it.
It's almost like "peaceful protest" is something that fascists can simply ignore.
Fascism on a national scale requires the consent or fear of the people in order to maintain power. They have to look strong. Anything that disturbs their voting bloc or contradicts the official narrative, especially on a broad stage, is going to cause them exponential problems because it looks like weakness. That's part of why fascism is inherently weak. Being able to ignore dissent is a luxury afforded only to the truly strong.
The fact that they aren't saying anything in this case means that they've calculated that the erosion of their base is preferable to letting the news cycle keep running with this.
You don’t understand how dictatorship works. Something as small as a busted escalator can bring down regime. You can’t afford to look foolish.
The Woman's March, BLM, Occupy Wallstreet, and the first No Kings were all successfully ignored. Millions of Americans marching is clearly not enough for us to be heard.
7 million people is roughly 2% of the population. It's 10% of the people in this country that couldn't be bothered to vote. There's also no threat or demands to accompany this protest. Like what are the people in power supposed to think. An easily ignorable voting block is slightly agitated enough to spend a few hours holding a sign? Are they going to stop working or consuming? Are they going to gather votes and banish the two parties that have failed us? No lmao they're just gonna get together once every couple of months, there's absolutely no pressure to a public gathering.
Mostly silent?! Except for the video King Trunp posted of him literally shitting on Americans. Presidential enough for you??
I had to find it for myself because I couldn't believe what you wrote. But its true! He's not even hiding how much he hates Americans anymore.
God, I can't believe you went even exagurating: https://youtu.be/ugrn6DNAYEU
what in the actual fuck
No exaggeration at all.
I guess it was meant to be a bomb but they didn't dare add that much violence to their propaganda, yet.
Poopaganda - and magats lap it up
Then nobody better tell me that protests don’t accomplish anything. Besides all the things you aren’t admitting they accomplish, getting republicans to shut up for a day is a damn miracle in itself.
It was supposed to be this dark, violent uprising of slavering feral ANTIFA Commies, and instead, it was a just a huge national street party/ MAGA Roast that MAGAs weren't invited to.
Now they have to explain to their cult how wrong they were about the left being violent and hating America, without looking like their feeling are hurt for not being included in the fun.
The right wing media is just waiting for the handful of police reports to come in from the weekend to fixate upon, and talk about non stop, so they can make that "violent uprising" a reality for their viewers.
I just heard an ABC reporter saying that the protests were non-violent, "for the most part."
"FOR THE MOST PART?" He said that without pointing out a single instance of it, and I haven't heard of any reports of violence. So why does he have to suggest, on national TV, that there was at least some violence, somewhere? All that does is feed MAGA lies. Now that can say that the protests were violent, they heard it on ABC, and they'd be accurate.
News organizations, whether left or right, should be required to be accurate.
It’s worth noting that there was an instance of a hit and run driver injuring a protestor, but this sort of violence is hardly what is implied by the ABC reporter’s statement. Of course, this is all on top of the unprovoked use of force by the feds.
Unfortunately the major outlets that claim to be more left are really just right wing lite, and at the end of the day they are still part of the propaganda machine.
The "left wing media" is only as left as their right wing owners will allow them to be.
it pisses me off the way they are trying to paint newz nation as the reasonable middle.
The truth hasn't stopped them before, why do you think they'll wait for it this time?!
the whol anti anti facist thing is a pretty daring stance for trump and johnson. So funny they act like they are the real americans.
Can't believe how many people haven't even heard of it when it's one of the biggest protests in US history. Those left-leaning news channels sure doing their job by covering it for 5 minutes I guess. None of my friends nor 3 other people I talked to today even knew what the protest was or that it was happening until I told them about it.
A lot of media outlets worldwide are ignoring these protests or covering them very briefly when nobody's watching. Most likely due to influence from the US.
Most people live their lives wholly unaware of reality. If their entertainment programming doesn’t consist of anything informational, they will never know about events except second hand from others, like your case. The silent majority doesn’t vote in elections, not because they don’t see the point, it’s because they likely had know idea there were elections.
I had to explain to my friends what “mid-terms” were. They vote in presidential elections..
And this is the threat posed by consolidating communication and media. Even if we want to organize a movement, we can't communicate with each other to organize it or share it.
It's part of the propaganda strategy to pick their battles. They never speak on your terms. They only speak when they have the upper hand. Keep in mind in general they never directly acknowledge any of your talking points. Not unless they have an avenue to interject logical fallacies and pivot the dialog to their terms.
The moment they start talking about this they lend credence to your side. It carves open space in public discourse. This is the exact same tactic they use against you. And people fall for it every time. You're never supposed to lend credence to their trolling. You're not supposed to feed the trolls. Yet here we are. A decade into this era of internet troll right wing politics. People started feeding the trolls and cannot help themselves.
I go into republican forums and post stuff I read on Lemmy to troll the shit out of them.
Are there many Republicans in the USA? I thought they won elections because they won the areas where votes are more valuable i.e. those places with very low population density. Same with American governance in general, like how California (pop. 39 MM & 732,189 people per electoral vote) has the same amount of Senators in Congress as Wyoming (pop. 587,000 & 192,284 people per electoral vote).
Would you say 1 out of 4 American adults are Republicans? 1 out of 3?
Tough to estimate. There are definitely fewer Republicans than the GOP would like you to believe; probably far below 50%. Many more people in the US are independent and will vote for a person over a party, or at least were. Republicans win due to a combination of the Electoral College (as you noted), coordinated misinformation campaigns (including by hostile nations), voter suppression, gerrymandering, low turnout, and the fact that older people both (1) skew conservative and (2) are more likely to be politically engaged than younger people.
So, actual Republicans? Yes, almost certainly closer to 25%. Probably fewer. People who say they're independent but functionally vote conservative in every election due to the aforementioned misinformation campaigns? Maybe another 10-15% at most. Remember, "did not vote" has run the board in every election for the past 40+ years, winning practically every state by a landslide.
But this article isn't about the rank-and-file Republican citizens. It's about the grifters in elected office.
But this article isn’t about the rank-and-file Republican citizens. It’s about the grifters in elected office.
Haha yes, it just got me thinking, that's all. Excellent points, thank you.
According to Pew research 49% lean democrat and 48% lean republican. From 2024
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/the-partisanship-and-ideology-of-american-voters/
They're silent because they know all the protestors will go back to work tomorrow. If you want to force them to acknowledge it you need to show up the next day as well.
I actually agree. The shit going down in the USA certainly deserves a General Strike.
And that's why unions were invented, to put that option on the table. How many % of workers are unionized in the US? Is there historical precedence of a general strike without unions?
This 💯. No kings was a protest, it is not a movement and is not trying to be a movement.
Ours coincided with our Pride, they actually marched with us in the parade up to the capitol and then joined us. It was incredible, unlike anything I've seen in this city. Do I think Trump is going to magically be unseated? No. But let's make a habit of this, since I am not sure voting will actually happen in 28, and we need mob size forces to be easily called up.
I was at a rally all day today. I saw two noteworthy attempts to counter protest the HUNDREDS of "no king" protesters that showed up in my city.
One was a guy who wrote couchfucker propaganda on his car in chalk paint. "JD Vance 2028" or something like that. He flipped us off at 50mph. Few saw it.
The second was a guy that brought his Charlie Kirk flag to the last 25 minutes of the protest, after 2/3rds of the no kings folks went home.
So, one was a coward that drove by one time. One time. I think he yelled something, but since Trump supporters don't believe in science, he didn't realize we can't hear shit when he's speeding by at 50 in a 35.
The second guy... Man, what do you even say? How about 'what the fuck even is a Charlie Kirk flag?' These people are mentally fucking ill. They will villainize and glorify anyone and anything. If Trump told them douchebags were a hallowed object tomorrow, they'd be lovingly calling themselves 'douchies' by next week.
I went to one and it had pretty good turnout for a town in the middle of nowhere in Maine
Two small towns in Ohio also had a surprising turnout considering they're both pretty damn red.