this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
101 points (96.3% liked)

Atheism

5303 readers
18 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago

Interesting, could be because it can expose kids to sex, incest and violence (via the bible stories)

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, most religious content is not appropriate to discuss at work. As it should be

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Unless of course you happen to know the one, true God, then you're bound to try to help others see the light and even abuse a potential position of authority to do so:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-allow-federal-workers-promote-religion-workplaces-2025-07-28/

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

Define "incorrectly"

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago

...so then these sisters get super horny, get their elderly father drunk, and repeatedly rape him until they get pregnant and give birth to their own brothers.

It's the holiest of books.

[–] G3NI5Y5@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Exposing children to these books and telling then it's reality, is child abuse.

And at the same time, people who believe these books, are banning other, more harmless books. You're ridiculous.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

I've never read the quran but the bible is absolutely nsfw and anyone who disagrees hadn't read the damned thing

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Its kind of funny, but if thats the threshold for NSFW then basically any fediverse or wiki app on F-Droid needs to be marked as NSFW...

Maybe add an antifeature for "cult content" :D

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably does. That being said most fediverse and Wikipedia do not feature stories of young teens getting their father drunk to pass on the genes after seeing their mother turned to salt because some angels got lost in rapesville.

Wikipedia has literally anything you can imagine on it, so of course it does have that. Just the article about the bible itself probably contains all the fucked up things that appear in the bible.
And the fediverse has every kind of porn from incest to zoophilia on it.

[–] mormund@feddit.org 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think the line is drawn if the content is contained in the app itself. Fediverse/Wiki apps are more like a browser. If you choose to visit a "NSFW" mastodon instance that is between you and the instance, not F-Droid.

Thats a good point

[–] ibot@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The author of the app says, his app does not contain any bible texts. Only chapters.

I agree, many parts of the bible are not safe for work.

Downvote me for it, but I I think it should not be flagged. The bible is simply not covered by F-Droids NSFW definition.

[–] mormund@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

If I read it correctly, they reverted the change for this app because it does not contain text itself.

It is fine to disagree about this for sure, in fact you'll never find a solution that makes everyone happy. Fortunately, you can add other repositories to F-Droid if you don't like there decisions.