It all tracks perfectly with “rules for thee but not for me.”
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10924 readers
26 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Through the whole of our correspondence, however, there is something Halligan never said: She never said a word suggesting that she was not “on the record.”
They're not sending their best...
Yes they are.
...but that's worse.
If you bring people in based on their personal loyalty, you select against competence. Competent people will tell you when you’re wrong and they’ll tell you things you don’t want to hear.
This is an administration built to be loyal, not competent.