this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
197 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26116 readers
2576 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A millionaire levy in Massachusetts that New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani holds up as a model for taxing the rich has generated $3 billion more in revenue than expected without forcing significant high-profile departures from the state.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh, look at that, they didn't all move out.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 40 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well if people are leaving the state to avoid this 4% tax we just got to enact it everywhere. Problem solved

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Then they’ll say they’ll leave the country, as they say here in the UK. And to that I say… AND? I don’t want a load of freeloading companies or billionaires. If you can get rich using public stuff like roads and stuff then you should want to contribute.

I’m happy to pay taxes for the betterment of society, I just want the wealthiest to pay their fair fucking share. How radical of me.

Funny as the Greens are running on this now and you can see people attacking them on appearance and other silly things because you really can’t attack their policies.

Fuck you Jeremy Clarkson for talking about poor teeth as if that’s a prerequisite for being a good person.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Then they’ll say they’ll leave the country

Which they never will. You could (and should) raise their tax rate all the way to 90% and the US system would STILL be better for enabling their excesses and protecting both their wealth and themselves than any other, since that's what it's been tailored specifically for since January 1981.

I don’t want a load of freeloading companies or billionaires. If you can get rich using public stuff like roads and stuff then you should want to contribute.

rAmen, brother/sister/other!

I’m happy to pay taxes for the betterment of society, I just want the wealthiest to pay their fair fucking share. How radical of me.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Lol

Josh Isner, president of taser manufacturer Axon Enterprise Inc., said the millionaire’s tax makes it harder to recruit talent — particularly well-paid artificial intelligence specialists — to the Northeast hub the company opened in Boston last year. But the office is based in the city because “Boston breeds super-talented people,” he said earlier this year.

But still...

He lives in Massachusetts, rather than near the company’s headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona, where income taxes are significantly lower. That’s largely because Massachusetts schools are so renowned, he said.

They're fucking millionaires...

They're not being "priced out" of states with taxes like this.

If they want to go live in Scottsdale Arizona, more power to them. But very few will.

And I'm super disappointed I couldn't find a clip from American Dad where Klaus shit's on Scottsdale.

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no data scientist, data engineer, or dev in the "AI space" that has turned down a million+ salary because of the state's mild marginal tax rate bump. Like, jfc, these pissbabies

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago

Million dollar salaries themselves are incredibly rare. Just executives and star talent whose names alone will bring in more investment. Being really smart isn't what drives a crazy salary like that.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 21 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It's more ironic to think that those pissy rich people throwing a tantrum about how taxes ruin everything, yet they almost always prefer to live in high taxes places because living there is better.

The hypocrisy would be so funny if it wasn't so harmful to most people.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

If they were just going to leave when taxes are imposed, they wouldn't be fighting it so hard. They spend huge amounts of money fighting tax increases because they know they'll stay either way

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I mean, only if you think those are genuine hissyfits and not just trying it just because it might work and costs them virtually nothing.

It's not that say it and back down.

It's that they say it because it costs them nothing to say it and they might get away with it.

[–] despite_velasquez@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

So… if you tax millionaires, they won’t simply leave?

Hmm…

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 15 hours ago

Time for establishment dems to ignore the statistics the same way the republicans ignore the rest of science.