this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
712 points (99.3% liked)

World News

50531 readers
2147 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 144 points 5 days ago

Because they’re racist, unaccountable, and don’t value humanity.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
  1. Lie that someone is a threat (without evidence)
  2. Justify killing him based on #1 (without due process)
  3. Claim that anyone opposing #1/#2 is aiding the enemy
  4. Justify killing that opposition based on #3/#1

Fascism 101

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So now the US can sink any ship on the high seas, no questions asked, no evidence given? Usually, terms like "state sponsored terrorism" are thrown about when dealing with such events.

Start blowing up American boats see how they like it

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 78 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Colombia should take this to the ICC, it won't so shit, but they should anyway.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 89 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The US not only withdrew its signature of the Rome Statute in 2002 (along with Israel) it also has a law that says they'll invade the Hague should a US war criminal ever be tried there.

Normal non-terrorist stuff.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 22 points 5 days ago

Oh I know that, hence that it won't do shit, as you rightly indicated, rule of law, with bug guns. Just another average day for countries like the US and Israel.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Thanks Bush.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Trump is a murderer and a vandal. And a rapist. And an insurectionist. He's probably jaywalked too.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you're deliberately trying to cheapen him being a rapist of children or if that was just a mid joke :(

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The worst part is that he isn't even just a child rapist. Partaking in and supporting something like Epstein's Island as somebody with that much wealth is so insanely disgusting, so far past the normal disgusting of ruining a single child's life like that.

We literally don't have a term for that besides "a billionaire".

Like, we don't know what happened there for decades.

Who is missing? What happened to them? Etc. because in that place, by those people, anything went, the law did, does, and will not apply, ever. Other than Jeffrey Epstein, there have been literally no consequences. It has been protected.

Trump is an active participant in that, and we are all the lambs under his party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 54 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Imagine breaking down while fishing, raising your engine, and setting up a distress call and being excited to see an American vessel approaching to help.

It then stops, trains its guns on you, and fires explosive shells.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

we have unmarked masked paramilitary randomly renditioning folks over here. we are a fucked up shithole country at this point. Every country needs to be prepping their military and diplomatic ties assuming the us may be an aggressor. Europe, japan, india, canada, south korea, australia, argentina, taiwan, brazil should think about a nato alternative.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whenever all this ends in half a century or whatever. There should probably be some kind of more generalized non-proliferation pact. To prevent a single nation from leap frogging every other by multiple factors.

It's a rogue state at this point. The most powerful one on earth. Who could stop them even if they wanted to.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

yeah this is what scares me and how come when people talk about moving out of the country its like. what and have less sensible citizens in the nation. I mean we have nukes.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 49 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Big picture he is trying to start a pointless war and then use it as a justification to Crack down on people in the US that say it's wrong to declare martial law as there are insurectionist among the people.

This will do away with due process for everyone and allow him to throw anyone he wants into prison.

The end goal will be to remain on office under the pretense that America is at war and it's own people cannot be trusted to elect another leader for the time being

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

Only until someone else will aim just a little more to the right.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

Imagine someone shooting a missile to an US yacht and then saying "drug smugglers!".

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

But...the Epstein files?

/s

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why did they just take his life like that?

Wrong place, wrong time, wrong color, wrong nationality :(

[–] wraithcoop@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 4 days ago

Yep. The cruelty was always the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

From drone strikes on sheep herders to stop "terrorists" to strikes on fishermen to stop "drugs". Taking all bets on what profession is the US gonna start bombing next, the excuse, method of bomb delivery and location. It's like Clue, but awful.

Smart money is on airstrikes on uber drivers in Chicago to stop Antifa.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's going to bomb penguins in Antarctica from a satellite because they look better in a tux than him.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Also that one island with penguins not paying their tariffs

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

There was a time during the war on terror when the US could have punished the the neocons who fabricated reasons to invade Iraq, the policymakers who sanctioned waterboarding and torture, and illiberal measures like the Patriot Act. But there were no consequences and so here we are with a lawless criminal regime running amok at home and abroad, sanctioning genocide and threatening and bombing countries without even the pretence of legitimacy.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Make Headlines Have Propositions/Articles Again! (or whatever grammatical components are necessary to make headlines easier to parse; less garden path-y)

Colombian WHO WAS killed in A U.S. [MILITARY?] strike was on a fishing trip, wife claims

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a suggestion:

Colombian WHO WAS killed ~~in~~ by A U.S. [MILITARY?] strike was on a fishing trip ~~, wife claims~~

The US military didn't provide any credible evidence, they are basically starting a terrorist blockade of waters, while the only "fact" we have is the wife statement. Under normal circumstance the wife statement should be treated as fact unless proven otherwise.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 12 points 5 days ago

Civilian MURDERED in TERRORIST ATTACK conducted by the US ARMED FORCES was on a fishing trip

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Well, as some pointed out, U.S. provided a picture of the boat, which was not a fishing boat, but an expensive speedboat. So there is some evidence against the wife's claim. On the other hand, a speedboat shouldn't have enough fuel to reach the U.S. So both stories seem suspicious.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What did you think it meant?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Colombian killed

Usually, sentences go noun-verb. So who did this Columbian kill?

Colombian killed in U.S.

Oh, a Columbian was killed. In the US, of all places! What happened?

Colombian killed in U.S. strike

Oh, weird. I wonder what kind of strike (maybe the government shutdown?) resulted in this Columbian getting killed.

Colombian killed in U.S. strike was on a fishing trip,

Oh, that doesn't make sense that there'd be a strike in the same place as a fishing trip. Wait, was he not in the US at all?

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Murderous fascists gonna murder fascistly.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 23 points 5 days ago

Because they have the fascist brain disorder and are a danger to all living.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Because they're pedophile fascists who need distractions from their inability to effectively govern.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

By 'mistake.' Apparently we are at war with fisherman.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

The Trump administration has said the U.S. is in a "non-international armed conflict" with drug cartels, arguing that the narcotics they smuggle kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, constituting an "armed attack."

Ah yes because nothing says "fighting the baddies" like blowing up another country's citizens to advance your imperialist and neo-colonialist agenda. When you're not killing brown people from the desert, you're killing brown people from the jungle.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Even if we don't believe that (which I don't) the dudes on the boats are not kingpins and commanders, they are one step above literal slaves, their choices are pretty much:

1: Drive the boat and don't get caught or tell anyone, or 2: get necklaced as soon as your wife is done getting necklaced

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Political theater for the benefit of their propaganda machines.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I'm not entirely sure about that, providing the photos USA showed are accurate (they might not be under this administration.) that wasn't a fishing boat, it was an expensive looking speed boat. Speed Boats are expensive in the world of boats, where everything is expensive.

But also a boat like that isn't making a crossing from Colombia to USA on a single tank of fuel and any storage is going to be needed for product, so it also seems very unlikely they were trafficking drugs.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The article missed to mention the man in question had old (10 years ago) charges about stealing 264 guns to the police that were going to be used as evidence against a paramilitar group: link in Spanish.

Obviously, this doesn't justify the bombing against a stranded civillian target with a broken boat asking for help.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"recent"... TEN years ago.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 5 points 5 days ago

My bad, I read months. Will fix my comment.

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I guess if Putin and Israel can do it why not the us. Who's going to stop us. We watched a genocide for the last two years, whos going to stop the us from bombing fisherman

[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Because good American soldiers follow orders.

load more comments
view more: next ›