this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
659 points (97.0% liked)

science

22250 readers
325 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] semisimian@startrek.website 19 points 3 days ago (8 children)

It doesn't look like they had a control group of people doing the strength training without any protein supplement. I would assume that group would also perform the same.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Study does not say anything about the diet of the subjects. This would make more sense if it was 22 vegan men with plant-protein supplement and 22 carnivore diet men with animal-protein supplement and a control of typical diet with no supplement.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There are a lot of upvotes here. Why would this make more sense?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Agreed, this is a dumb comment that has no relation to the study being done, only some study they imagined in their mind.

People love to second guess scientific studies like they're set up by complete fucking morons with no review or oversight. Truly their 10 seconds of amateur brilliance is going to see the trivial flaw no one among the team of people doing this as their actual job noticed. If something sounds obviously wrong in a science article, the source of that wrongness is almost certainly either the author of the article or you.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

which supplements has the highest lead though

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›