porcoesphino

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, I down voted for the poster not saving some of us a click

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I'd argue memes that duplicate other peoples work are common but questionable on the ethical front.

Kind of like how alcohol consumption is common and got shoehorned in through our long history with it but newer drugs are more likely to have people question their cost to society (and demonise them usually for political gain, still many have some obvious costs).

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you're a small family store that makes an amazing recipe and people love it, and you keep that recipe a secret. You're honestly okay with a competitor stealing it? Not a competitor making a bad ripoff, but finding a way to get the recipe and using that to clone the meal for a profit.

Obviously with larger companies it's easier to say fuck them but investing time in something and then having it taken is a hit even if its "information", isn't it?

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

And remove any need to offer them security from China

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

I'm amazed at how many people found rogan authentic. Is it the same sort of podcasters playing off people's intuitions, like the fact checker used to?

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not very bilingual but I grew up with English and have spent a few months in Latin America.

I noticed that in English I now say Mexico the Spanish way when I'm with local people, but the English way when I'm visiting friends in the US. I always say it the Spanish way in Spanish, and don't think I use any regional accents.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I'd add "mania" to that list of terms that need defining. They seem to have a specific meaning that's probably misaligned with most people reading the question:

https://lemmy.world/comment/19666332

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Does anyone have a good breakdown of this 1.5 trillion number?

Everything I saw while searching was pretty right wing and it would be nice to have an idea if some of it is pessimistic, or even to have some of the numbers explained rather than solely demonised.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

That doesn't change the logic I gave

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why? Lemmy seems great

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

I honestly hadn't noticed this. I see it in ICE though

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What if there is a popular joke that relies on bad math that happens to be your question. Then the alignment is understandable and no indication of accuracy. Why use a tool with known issues, and overhead like querying six, instead of using a decent tool like Wolfram alpha?

view more: next ›