this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
811 points (97.9% liked)

memes

17841 readers
3549 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screencap)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard, and I don't know if this is true, that voice actors who specialize in narrating books have to be superstars at this. Not only are they expected to be able to sight-read an entire book without making mistakes, they also need to do the required acting so exciting scenes are exciting, happy scenes are happy, gloomy scenes are gloomy, etc. Plus, as they come across new characters in the book, they're supposed to be able to give them distinct voices and remember and recreate those voices as they show up later in the book.

Of course, a blockbuster book with a big budget for the audio version won't have an actor wing it. They'll be able to pay to have an actor and a director read the book first, and then have the director work with the actor to tease out the best possible performance. But, for a smaller budget, you have to deal with tighter margins so every second in the voice over booth counts.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 3 hours ago

without making mistakes

This part is not true at all. I know a guy who edits these, and from what I hear, re-reads are very much a thing.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You type in English because it's the only language you know.

I type in English because it's the only language you know.

我哋唔一樣 (We are not the same)

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

One thing I love doing is to learn to say "I don't speak " as well as possible in a language I don't speak. If you're good enough at it, people will assume it's a joke and try to speak to you in that language you don't actually know. Apparently I'm pretty good at saying it in Portuguese, but I wouldn't know.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Most of what I got out of a Japanese class I took was how to say that I don't understand Japanese.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Excuse me I am more fluent in Gibberish than I am in English

Edit:too much Gibberish, not enough English

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago

You fuckin with the wrong people then. Find people with soul and their nudes will have soul.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 31 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Please don't, I've read so many words that I've never said aloud and am 100% saying them wrong

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 21 points 10 hours ago

Never make fun of someone if they mispronounce a word. It means they learned it by reading.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I made the mistake of pronouncing the "s" in "debris" once, and a pedantic acquaintance pretended to not know the word over and over as I repeated it, until I finally realized the mistake. If he'd simply corrected me, I would have laughed at myself and appreciated him. But he had to be a smug prick about it, and now I permanently resent him.

Sorry for the mini trauma dump. Just agreeing with your sentiment.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I had a coworker who would frequently say "Not to be pendantic..." and I honestly could not tell if he was just fucking with me.

[–] tpyoman@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Yikes fuck that person for doing that.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

I've started pronouncing debris like the British do and now I just do it all the time as I read.

I also say "sooorry" instead of "sorry" because I jokes around one too many times on a trip to Montana.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I learned English reading so many books that I just pronounced how it's spelled in my head. Combine that with general non-social tendencies I didn't really heard or had to say a lot of those words.

I had to spell out words to people because of that. Then I came to US, and now I can't even spell the words because the alphabets are pronounced differently lol.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I immigrated to the US at like 8 years old, I speak on a native level, in contrast, my older brother stuggles like a lot, I noticed an accent. I asked my classmated if I have an accent, and they don't seem to notice any foreign accents.

Even then, there are still weird words that feels very weird to me. Like wtf is colonel = kernel , lmfao

[–] wieson@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

You do have an accent. It's the same accent as everyone around you. There is no speech without accent.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Colonel is like that because English and French have a messy history and we refuse to change either the spelling or pronunciation to fix it. French took the word "colonello" from Italian and adapted it as "coronel", English took that version and pronounced it poorly. Scholars tried to re-align to the Italian origin by spelling it "colonel" but nobody changed the way they said it and it's been that way for over 400 years.

In British English they pronounce "lieutenant" as "lefftenant" for a harder to trace, and presumably stupider, reason. When an English word doesn't make sense it's probably because it came from at least one other language and was adapted just enough to fit the phonemes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

You don't want to hear me read aloud, I deliberately add malapropisms because I find them funny, especially when I have to read the names of fantasy characters and places. I am not going to read your pronunciation guide in your half baked fantasy language! You're not Tolkien! If it reads like Chicken, I'm saying Chicken.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I always read emphasis as "em-FASS-is" just for fun.

[–] joshthewaster@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Malapropisms - learned a new word today and it's a fun one. I do the same thing in my head when I read, any name I don't know how to pronounce becomes something I do know how to pronounce and stays that way for the rest of the story.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's the reason why i use latin as base when i name things in fantasy, it both sound good and can't be misspelled

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Oh I am Mery hoot at misspeeling

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 2 points 10 hours ago

One of my favourite things about Brandon Sanderson's fantasy books is that the pronunciation is canonically "whatever goes". Even the author himself doesn't use the pronunciations he originally imagined when writing.

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 103 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Okay, but I'm reading naked.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting choice of books to read out loud.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

A dramatic retelling (and interpretive dance) of John Cage's "4'33""

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 52 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago

Sure, when they do it they're "awesome" but when I do it suddenly I'm "tresspassing" and "not allowed to come back to the library".

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

This is allowed. Not wanted, but allowed.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 71 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m diagnosed dyslexic which, when reading aloud, sends me into a stutter to full embarrassed apologies. When reading to myself, I’ll make it 10 pages before I realize I didn’t read shit. I’m never getting laid in your hypothetical world.

Who am I kidding? I’m not getting laid as is.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 27 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Man idk

I got a date secured and it dawned on me that I am NOT ready to have a date over. Like you ever realize how many things you gotta take care of that you stopped paying attention to?

Like fine, clear your counters, sweep the floor, clean the bathroom, replace the burnt out light bulb, clean sheets on bed, on box spring, on bedframe, shampoo carpets, dust shelves, put away clean clothes, wash dirty clothes, check your fingernails, check your ear and nose hair, your regular hair, make sure they don't have allergies, etc, etc.

Im ok with not getting laid I don't have the energy to go to work, do all that shit, panic for a week about the date, have fun at the date, play the social awkward dance of "more, not more" and potentially end up having her see that I'm an absolute disaster?

Nah I'm good.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't know if it's just my neurodivergencies speaking, but that's wayy too much. No way I'd ever do that, nor expect someone to do that for me. Basic things such as clean sheets and cleaning yourself? Sure. Dusting shelves, shampooing carpets, making sure everything is perfectly order, and other less important things like that? No I find that excessive and exhausting (although I don't like or have carpets in the first place). If someone comes over to visit they better be satisfied with a dryer rack full of clean clothes

But I'm definitively someone that does not care about the dance, as you call it. It's too exhausting. And as we're all bogged down by too much work, mental health issues, and/or neurodivergencies and disabilities.. what purpose does it serve? All it ends up doing is make us more isolated because we feel like we have to present ourselves as "perfect" for other people. If we can't actually feel comfortable in a social situation with someone and actually relax and reduce our stress.. something has gone wrong.

Like yes, don't have moldy food in the counter, but some dirty dishes in the sink are fine, you know?

But again, maybe it's because I'm more entrenched in neurodivergent/disability culture. I don't hold this kinda stuff against people, and I hope they don't hold it against me back. I know how hard it can be. I think it's much nicer when we can accept, and enjoy time with, imperfect humans, than always expect and demand perfect humans. Especially when none of us are perfect in reality.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 22 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, I have SO many rescue animals, it’s hard to explain to normal people. Multiple dogs with all sorts of problems, a few parrots, an angry hedgehog, two cats, and my vet’s first call to foster (almost anything). They are all well taken care of and clean but there’s a… smell.

I’m also holding Balthazar, a bark scorpion, against his will for invading Pretty Kitty Pepper’s land. Balthazar is kept well and fed a steady diet of pinheads. When he eats, it looks like a dot matrix printer in reverse. That’s the one creature in the house most people freak out about the most, but they would all be wise to fear the parrots.

Pretty Kitty Pepper for reference

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Hey my cat's favorite hobby is trying to give me pink eye by farting at my face. Your place probably smells better than any room he's in.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I had a friend who was married to a veteranarian who worked with exotic animals. They were constantly fostering bird rescues. He told me once he fell asleep on the couch and woke up as a parrot was reaching for his glasses. He said he knew this bird wouldn't intentionally hurt him but seeing a 4-year-old child with a can opener on its face reaching for him was pretty scary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 15 hours ago

Show me the progress of your most recently opened audiobook.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Don't fall for it ppl! This is just the AI wanting more samples to detect, know and reproduce our voices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Oof, that's at least 1/4 of USA just OUT

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

You wish.

more than half of people living in the United States between the ages of 16 and 74 read below a sixth-grade level

https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/08/02/us-literacy-rate/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›