this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
398 points (98.3% liked)

politics

26216 readers
2673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wish this was an inflated title but no, he really said this.

America, you need to get rid of this asshole ASAP.

Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115460423936412555

Thanks @notarobot@lemmy.zip

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 minutes ago

Are they trying to figure out what the expiration date is on nuclear warheads? The fuq are they still needing to test for?

Let's just blow up our arsenal for the heck of it boyz, it will make for a good twitter post!

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago

“Was department”

ROFL! He’s like a little child in a cardboard fort, pretending the furniture is a threat.

Someone needs to put him in a home where he can pretend to be whatever he wants.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

That guy is an absolute fud! He sees some other moron do it, and thinks he has to do it too so he looks "alpha"... Talk about your beta bitches, jesus christ.

[–] Zeon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why does he capitalize random words?

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

He’s old and his last bout of formative education predates most of our parents’ lives.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why? They work... We checked.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 9 points 7 hours ago

Orange Don wants to make sure he can launch them the next time someone calls him names, without anyone being able to stop him

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

don't indulge his bullshit attempt to rename the DOD

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We have the technology, the time is now to blow up the moon, children are our future.

https://youtu.be/GTJ3LIA5LmA

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, we do not in fact have the technology necessary to blow up the Moon.

[–] Meowie_Gamer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

i cannot stop laughing at this i dont know why

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Dumbass probably watched a movie and was like duuuuh that looks cool lolz...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 6 hours ago

He's going to look at one directly, just like he did with the eclipse.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Choose one...global warming or nuclear winter. I think that is our futures only options.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 7 hours ago

There's always the mass-extinction asteroid option to look forward to.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

This is horrifying. Like, mind-bogglingly bad.

It's also a blatant lie. Other countries are not testing nuclear weapons, they're running simulations. We didn't do that in the 60s because it wasn't possible, but the US (and presumably China/Russia) literally have giant supercomputers for this purpose now.

...And we would know if they were doing real testing because it would show up on seismographs.


But who cares about truth? Or sanity? No, all my relatives (even scientifically minded ones) won't even bat an eye, lest some Democrat steal their retirement, ugh.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Trumplethinskin is too stupid to understand any of that . He desperately wants to to be the one to trigger a spectacular overreaction and turn another country into glass.

#smallcarrotproblems

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago

show up on seismographs

and any surface tests would show up on sattelites

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Even if it wasn't for the other million reasons, this guy's grammar alone should disqualify him from having the nuclear codes.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Secured safely in the bathroom of his golf course.

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

A giant waste of money. 800 nukes is plenty for pretty much anything and launching 100 would probably mean the end of life as we know it on planet earth. If you wanted to blow a bunch of money on the military there are better ways to do it.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

100 would probably mean the end of life as we know it on planet earth

It would alter the course of human history for sure, but it wouldn't actually end human civilization. Just being annoyingly pedantic after growing up in the cold war and learning about such cheerful topics as fallout patterns and blast wave radius and how to fashion air purifiers from an early age.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 11 hours ago

If you wanted to blow a bunch of money on the military there are better ways to do it.

Ohh we got you fam.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

True, but don't tell them that, it's better if they waste money on useless nuclears than genocide technology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Are any other countries actually actively testing nuclear weapons?
(I don't think North Korea counts/is.)

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. We know they work.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

It's very expensive too. It takes a LOT of time and resources to make spicy rocks even more spicy. It's a huge waste of money to test a system we perfected decades ago when you can simulate detonations for almost nothing.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 33 points 17 hours ago

Just shows he is desperately trying to create many more distractions from the Epstein files to see what works.

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Testing for what exactly? Do we not know enough about them already?

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 3 points 6 hours ago

Primative chest pounding. He has to prove his chest makes a bigger sound. Or his nuke is bigger than their dick.

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago

Gotta keep them hurricanes scared.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The real crazy people who would cause a nuclear wae are israel and the usa leaders not Iran

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

One can never be sure what President Brain Worms is talking about but I'm pretty sure Obama started a ten year plan to modernize our nuclear forces early in his presidency.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

ffs we're still in 2025 man.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

As if nuking Russia would help. They have the Dead-Hand system. No one wins here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 20 hours ago

Ah, the "I had no choice!" argument for scaling up world tension. Yeah, we've never heard that one before. Hitler also "had no choice" but to invade Sudetenland, Austria and Poland.

The "we had no choice" argument is always used to take the victim role as an excuse to justify anything you like. Whether it is joining wars because they sank your illegal weapons shipment hidden in an ocean liner, invading a country because you made it look like they sank your ship, invade a country because a few terrorists attacked your country, invade a country because you claim there might be weapons of mass destruction, send troops and chemical weapons to a dictatorial regime because the freedom fighters threaten your overseas naval base, invade a country for denazification, commit ethnic cleansing, genocide and other horrible war crimes because some terrorist extremists attacked your country after years and years of oppression and apartheid, etc etc etc. There are so many examples in history where this tactic has been used. The entire cold war thrived on this bullshit argument "look at them, I have no choice".

"I'm going to do something bad, so I find a way to justify it."

  • every dictator, agressor, war criminal in history.
[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 64 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

He's been itching to nuke something since his first term. Hurricanes, he suggested at one point. And Americans voted him into office twice. Fucking morons.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Some Americans voted for him 3 times!

Seriously, imagine how fucking dumb you would have to be to fill out three separate ballots over nearly a decade voting for a failed reality TV star.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Now imagine those who want to not have to vote anymore and let him run forever

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›