this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
58 points (98.3% liked)

World News

33480 readers
706 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicsploogedrizzle@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A baby born on Dec 31st is 1 year old, and the next day would be 2 years old ... A 2 day old baby would be considered 2 years old. Glad they decided that this was beyond odd.

[–] dotancohen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

My daughter was born at 22:30 on December 31. In Korea she would have been considered 2 years old when she was born less than 2 hours previously.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Too bad they didn't keep their very own system of measurement which is so much more convenient than the internationally recognized and simple system... Not looking in anybody's direction

[–] Augapfel@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

babies are considered a year old on the day they’re born

Is there any useful idea behind this? That sounds completely dumb.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's just semantics. When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life. After a full year, you are one year old. Grammar varies from language to language, and sometimes one feels more natural.

Imagine everyone in English said "I'm in my 32nd year" instead of "I'm 31 years old." Now you meet a foreigner who says the opposite. Translation issues abound!

[–] ssjmarx@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life.

There are one type of person in this world. Those that understand arrays, and those that don't.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair, we do the same shit with what century we are in.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right. But as most people don't measure their age in centuries (yet), it isn't a problem.

I'm hoping the debate emerges when I'm in my 7th century.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You mean when you're 6 centuries old?

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Exactly 😂

[–] zingo@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Gangnam Style! Op op op!

load more comments
view more: next ›