this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
154 points (91.0% liked)

Games

38402 readers
1343 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While Blizzard is very much focussed on its big money-makers like its various Warcraft games, from WoW to Hearthstone to Warcraft Rumble, as well as Diablo and the much-maligned Overwatch 2, he's still open to StarCraft making a comeback. That said, RTS fans shouldn't get their hopes up. While the series might return, that doesn't necessarily mean it will be an RTS, and whatever shape it takes will depend on the person or team who goes to bat for it.

"It's not me saying, 'Go make a StarCraft game,'" Ybarra told Bloomberg. "I need to have someone who has the vision and passion that comes with the idea, and I'll bet on that team."

A vision and passion he - according to his own words - clearly does not have. πŸ˜‘

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loo@lemmy.world 123 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

The good days of Blizzard are over, I'm not getting my hopes up for anything they produce nowadays.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'll keep an ear to the ground.

But I don't like that $90 preorder logic at all, it's almost weird it exists.

I try to imagine going to a gamestop and a gaming associate was like, buy that game 3 days later and I'll give you $20.

Skip the in game pet and mount, that most people forget exists after the expansion, and I'll make that $40

But then.... why does this system exist?!

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

Early access is the new fad, because it costs nothing and has value to some players. The increasing drive for more monetization is Activision's influence, Blizzard was really lazy about it before being bought.

At least early access makes a little sense in an mmo. The new areas are super crowded on launch, so letting some get through early does help.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

But then… why does this system exist?!

Because it works and makes them money! You can bet that other publishers will take notice and you'll see such money grabbing schemes becoming more and more common.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Fomo is a powerful drug

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Blizzard died a long time ago.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, let's not forget that Blizzard was bought by Activision and Activision was just bought by Microsoft.

There is no "Blizzard", just Microsoft.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I genuinely have more faith in Microsoft than Activision.

I don't have any empirical evidence, but for some reason I do.

[–] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago

"Ohoho Kerrigan got herself in a big pickle, could you help her collect all these fruit?"

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

StarCraft Ghost back on the menu?

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

Yeah it's been awhile, old penny arcade about it been almost 20 years. I remember hoping to see it at the time.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago

The next Starcraft game will be a MOBA BR because that's the most soulless thing we could think of and it's our best bet to boost shareholder confidence.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's going to be a mobile game.

[–] caveman8000@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

What, you don't have a phone?

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Pay to win, actually

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Filled with micro transactions too. I’d be surprised if it isn’t P2W

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I hope StarCraft: Ghost finally gets made. IIRC, it was supposed to be a 3rd person shooter.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

"The lights mean stealth!"

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was made then they shelved it

[–] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A build was leaked, it wasn't complete but according to the reports it had like 2 complete worlds.

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You can play the two "finished" levels from beginning to end, but the actual gameplay is very rough.

load more comments (1 replies)

I came in looking for this comment. Maybe they can redevelop it along with Robotech: Crystal Dreams

[–] SLGC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

For N64 right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bigbadmoose@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] evening_push579@feddit.nu 7 points 2 years ago

My thought exactly!

[–] AHorseWithNoNeigh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Beat me to it. I'd put money on them completing this (or a bastardization of what it was supposed to be).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do we have StarCraft on mobile. Maybe StarCraft Immortal something?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you guys not have phones?

[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you guys not have credit card(s) ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago

Mobile gacha / 10

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is there any point to StarCraft if it’s not an RTS?

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Idk, I always thought Starcraft: Ghost sounded promising. Actually being able to participate in one of the battles seemed pretty cool to me. Of course, the devil is usually in the details.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

World of StarCraft? /s

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why do I feel like this is gonna just be M$/Activi$ion/Blizzard going, "Hey look at Starfield, we have a sci-fi thing, let's copy Starfield with our sci-fi IP".

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

And I mean, while I can't see a Starfield-clone work in the Starcraft universe, I could see an adjacent spin-off game work really well like being a cargo-pilot having to drop stuff off on planets during active battles with fire all around you, or an exploration game where you explore galaxies and have to avoid being detected/caught by the zerg and/or protoss.

But I can't see the modern Actiblizzking pull that off, even with MS throwing endless money at them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Sounds like under Microsoft it's going to be a first person shooter :rolls eyes:

[–] kogs@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

To be fair, I reckon a well made SC FPS could be pretty rad if you got to play each species/unit type. Playing as a Zealot or Dark Templar would be awesome.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Blizzard cut their teeth and grew most of their oldest fans on RTS's, and now don't want to make more RTS because the average gamer wants to play an arena game, battle royal or rpg. The RTS market is there, investors just don't see it because RTS tends to be more niche and players putting in more hours overall compared to more casual friendly genres.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

how about make a new fucking game?

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Take that back, StarCraft deserves another installment

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some time back there was an April Fool's Day release for World of Starcraft. I assume they didn't make it because they had maxed out their bank accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd love for Blizzard to pursue a genuine passion project. Ask the Microsoft overlords for a few years to put out something not beholden to sales expectations or profit. They can devote a small team to make something that they want to while the rest of the company continues on with its soulless corporate entertainment fabricator to fund the creative projects. You need creative projects to keep the workforce engaged.

If nothing else, Activision Blizzard was seen as a greedy, profit-driven machine which continually pushed out semi-entertaining products with en emphasis on FOMO micro-transactions and monetization schemes. Blizzard is a shell of what it once was.

Let them get back to their roots. Let them focus on engagement and fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mordachai_Shedbacon@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Do yOu GUys not hAve phoNes??

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago

We can only pray they won't. It won't be good.

[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I thought they were shutting down Hearthstone?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί