this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
207 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

70285 readers
3419 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can we... see them?

Edit: some quick math, the minimum recommended space between trees is 3m, 200 million of those is 600km² / 148k ac , which would make the space required bigger than 17 countries (larger than Andorra but very slightly smaller than Saint Lucia). They have a blog with their tree planting updates but I wish there were more photos.

[–] LibreFish@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The big turning point came in 2018 when I signed a legally binding commitment to ensure that Ecosia could never be sold and that 100% of our profits would always go to the planet. Today, your searches enable us to work with partners to plant and protect 1,250 species of trees across 95,000 locations globally.

Keywords plant and protect. Basically a papermill can plant trees to harvest 20 years later and in the meantime sell carbon offsets for 19 years then harvest and replant.

Can't say for sure they're doing it, but from what I hear just about every tree is eligible for a "carbon offset" and some companies abuse it by saying "this is our tree" as long as it's not cut down within x months and use it as a carbon offset or a "protected tree."

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ecosia doesn't sell carbon credits though.

[–] LibreFish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They might buy them though to inflate the number of protected trees. I'm not saying they are, just providing a potential reason for such a large number

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My understanding from reading their posts is that the counter only counts planted trees. Other things like building solar panels and fight deforestation are not even counted like that. That's why they said they are phasing out the individual tree counter, because it doesn't account for all those other things.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

This is a necessary reminder that Ecosia is a scam:

  • they don't "plant trees" but rather contribute very little amounts to existing programmes
  • "Every search plants a tree" is a lie. It's not every search, but rather every couple clicks on an ad
  • They use Bing results making them useless

If you're using Ecosia with an adblocker or knowingly skip over sponsored results then you are NOT in any way contributing to the tree-planting

[–] Star@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

they don’t “plant trees” but rather contribute very little amounts to existing programmes

Ofcourse they don't plant trees themselves, it's a search engine with a small team. They donate their entire profit which averages upwards of a million euros every month, to local tree planting initiatives across the world and that isn't a 'little' number at all.

“Every search plants a tree” is a lie. It’s not every search, but rather every couple clicks on an ad

I agree, they were 'a bit' misleading with that in the past. Although they did state in their tree counter earlier and somewhere in their website/blog that it was roughly 45 searches (in Germany, depends on region) which raised enough money to plant a tree. They've since removed most, if not all of the misinformation.

They use Bing results making them useless

Since when does using Bing results make a search engine a 'scam'? DuckDuckGo also uses Bing results, would you call that a scam as well? Ecosia uses Bing search results because it's close to impossible to make an independent search engine which gives satisfactory results without the resources of a tech giant.

[–] joelimgu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they are pretty clear about that. Also, how is that worse than Google or bing? It's not a dream sure, but its a lot better than your money going to Google

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they are not "clear about that". I can see they removed it now but for the longest time the main page had a banner saying "every search plants a tree" and also an actual counter which went up by one every time you made a search -- which was misleading, because it wasn't every "search", because you would have to click on an ad, and it wasn't "every", because it took several clicks on an ad to actually contribute an equivalent of a tree

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How many trees did you plant?

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does not sound like a scam.

The build a website, with ads, and donate the revenue.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is a scam if you make claims that "every search plants a tree"

[–] LemonLord@endlesstalk.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But this they don't say on their website. You have to search a lot of more for a tree.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They removed it recently, probably someone called them out on it. And again, searches have nothing to do with funding the tree-planting, it's clicking on ads

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many trees have you planted?

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If fruit trees count then around 50, why?

[–] gaifux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would fruit trees ever be excluded from one's aggregate tree count?

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 1 year ago

Coz they small

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I ask what search engine you would recommend that is not some kind of misleading or a scam

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think your second and third point are well known or at least easily conceivable, but where did you get your first point from? Plain curiosity

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

How many have you planted?

[–] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather 'little contribution' than none at all. I'd rather 'every couple of clicks' than none at all. It's not perfect, but it's better than the major alternatives.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’ve helped humanity so much more, so let’s shit on them.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

What’s your contribution?

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd like to try using this, but I like to search by "all regions" and it won't ever save my preferences in Fennec

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm usually connected to a VPN, so it incorrectly auto-detects my region, and also I just don't like the idea that results are being served based on regional trends and interests

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. I wish there was a way to provide settings via a custom URL

Yes! That's how I do it with Mojeek, which is my current search engine of choice

[–] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

I miss their old app logo