this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

196

17030 readers
823 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pepperette@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

A guy found a magic lamp and a Genie popped out and offered him infinite wisdom or infinite wealth. He asks for wisdom, the genie grants it and disappears in a puff of smoke. As the smoke clears the guys says "aw crap, I should have took the money"

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If he had a choice between being smart or being poor, he would choose to be smart.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like you made a poor choice.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago
[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

If he had a choice between good option A or bad option B, he would choose good option A.

[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

If he had a choice between being smart or being poor, he would choose to be smart.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago

Medieval people had the "divine right of kings." Modern people have the "must be brilliant to be that rich" fallacy.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Does anyone actually choose to be poor if being smart is the other option? Feels like you'd already have to not be very smart to get the choice wrong.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, but I would speculate most cases would involve those in a religious order or something similar.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Even for a religious person, being smart within their company is usually preferred. Priests and the like take great pride in their knowledge of faith and understanding of wisdom. They may take a vow of servitude and condemn themselves to poverty, but they do so with the apparent knowledge they will be rewarded for their sacrifice. That is playing the long game, which takes smarts. "Understanding God's love" and the required knowledge to be a part of a faith, you know?

People prefer to be smart over poor, when those are the only two options

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Drug and alcohol abusers tend to end up with just that double move.

[–] lugal@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago

When I was young, I was poor. But after decades of hard work, I'm not young anymore.

[–] Andiloor@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

If I were to choose between having a positive quality or having a negative quality, I would have the positive quality

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Brave choice. Most people would have chosen the lifetime supply of Frisbees.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

I would choose being poor just to avoid being able to read this.

[–] Ambiorickx@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

That makes sense, because then you are smart, and with hard work and dedication, you can become poor as well. But if you choose poverty, there's no amount of hard work and dedication that will increase your intelligence.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Smarts don't pay the fucking bills.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=y5FNoFIfl1Y

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments
view more: next ›