this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
691 points (100.0% liked)

196

17027 readers
928 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 96 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Shit, another existential crisis. At least I'll forget about it soon

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

Your a computer plugged into an organic matrix.

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 months ago

at this rate the next meme i see is going to tell me to wake up from my coma

i'm trying

[–] Hailstorm8440@sh.itjust.works 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a large language model i cannot answer that question

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do LLMs dream of weighted sheep?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry, I cannot answer that as I was not trained enough to differentiate between all the possible weights used to weigh a sheep during my dreams.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've always said that Turing's Imitation Game is a flawed way to determine if an AI is actually intelligent. The flaw is the assumption that humans are intelligent.

Humans are capable of intelligence, but most of the time we're just responding to stimulus in predictable ways.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's a running joke in the field that AI is the set of things that computers cannot yet do well.

We used to think that you had to be intelligent to be a chess grandmaster. Now we know that you only have to be freakishly good at chess.

Now we're having a similar realization about conversation.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Didn't really need an AI for chess to know that. A look at how crazy some grandmasters will show you that. Bobby Fischer is the most obvious one, but there's quite a few where you wish they would stop talking about things that aren't chess.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Do LLMs have ADHD?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 31 points 11 months ago

Look at this another way. We succeeded too well and instead of making a superior AI we made a synthetic human with all our flaws.

Realistically LLMs are just complex models based on our own past creations. So why wouldn't they be a mirror of their creator, good and bad?

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Baizey 1 points 11 months ago

They can certainly be promoted towards it

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

what if the whole universe is just the algorithm and data used to feed and LLM? we're all just chat gpt

(i don't know how LLMs work)

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We basically are. We’re biological pattern recognising machines, where inputs influence everything.

The only difference is somehow our electricity has decided it’s got free will.

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

well that decides it, gods are real and we're their chat gpt, all our creations are just responses to their prompts lmao

it's wild though, i've heard that we don't really have free will but i guess i'm personally mixed on it as i haven't really looked that into it/thought much about it. it intuitively makes sense to me, though. that we wouldn't, i mean, really have free will. i mean we're just big walking colonies of micro-organisms, right? what is me, what is them? -- idk where i'm going with this

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Welcome to philosophy... I think.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Andonno@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I think I think, therefore, I think I think I am, I think?

This is as close to a statement of certainty as you will get from philosophy.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

metaphysics

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

... is the answer Gilbert Gottfried?

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A (somewhat wrong) reference to another exurb1a video on philosophy, found here with relevant timestamp. While Gilbert Gottfried is brought up in that section, the joke I was making should have ended in Emma Stone instead.

As for who he is, he's a comedian with a very specific voice, and voiced Iago in Disney's Alladin if you've seen it. He got a bit canceled for making jokes that iirc at least bordered on racist to the Japanese shortly after a disaster of theirs, and lost his role as the voice of the Aflac duck.

Oh, I forgot he passed... hmmm.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

here with relevant timestamp

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

... uhh... I don't know who that is. Wanna infodump?

[–] Senseless@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's LLM? I feel addressed and need another rabbit hole I can delve into.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Large Language Model, ChatGPT and friends

[–] Senseless@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

Oh, of course. Hadn't thought in that direction.

[–] Glaive0@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Well, I never wanted you to be any kind of model, but here I am.

[–] fnmain@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Can't LLMs take an insane number of tokens as context now (I think we're up to 1M)

Anywho, he just like me fr