this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
915 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

49959 readers
667 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just install debian on it.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can't, hardcoded, it's a chip, connected to Musk servers via Google

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what are electrolytes?

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

They are what ~~maximizes shareholder value~~ plants crave, ofc!

And what is it that plants crave? Why, electrolytes ofc!

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You barely can control cursor with your brain, it is impossible for the chip to control what you see. Maybe in a century...

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, no need to be so pessimistic. I'd give it another decade or two.

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's been several centuries and yet the brain is still a big mystery for the humanity. I don't think 2 decades would be enough. I'm not saying that I'm against cool technologies, but such a progress is hard to imagine being done so "soon".

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Technological progress follows an exponential curve, why would this be any different?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technological progress can follow an exponential curve. It doesn't have to. Which is why we're still using the same basic pacemakers that were invented in the 1950s. Nothing better has been invented for people who have the sort of heart conditions that require pacemakers.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're right, it's more of an S-curve for any particular technology. But I doubt we've seen the climax of brain-machine-interfaces.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I hope not for the sake of paralyzed people and the like, but I wouldn't trust an Elon Musk company to be the one to do it.

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just feels unimaginable. But it's interesting to see what the future will bring us.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'm massively optimistic about the rate of tech development, I think we'll have some really world changing things in twenty years but I really cant see brain implanted AR being a thing for a long time

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It won't stop people from trying all sort of shit even if we don't know how the human brain works.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

And you will never need more than 640kb of ram. :)

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every piece of new technology is impossible until it suddenly isn't anymore

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is your benchmark for success? A brain chip that can augment reality? In my opinion the real potential for a brain chip is more of a technology to expand accessibility to people who can't control their bodies. Also in my opinion, no one should trust Elon Musk or anything he makes so Neural Link I don't think highly of. The potential to provide people with severe mobility challenges another means to interact with the world is something worth developing. That I can see happening in a decade or two. A general purpose brain chip, yeah a hundred years plus, if ever.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Under capitalism? I wouldn’t trust any sort of tech implant. I say that from the comfort of my full physical faculties, so maybe it’d be different if I couldn’t, but Jesus I cannot imagine being at the whim of any tech company.

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

at the end of the day, youre still trusting them

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Them who? I ain't trusting nobody.

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

neuralink. and im not directing this at you specifically, but anyone who will get the implant, believing that it's read-only

[–] FrederikNJS@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Ghost in the Shell is rapidly becoming a documentary.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preferable to ads, which I assume is the profit incentive to ever develop the technology in the first place.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago

Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?

Well, sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines, and movies, and at ball games, and on buses, and milk cartons, and T-shirts, and bananas, and written on the sky... But not in dreams, no siree!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"For long-term memories, please sign up for Neuralink Blue. Only $8 a month!"

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to be able to "hack" asshole people randomly, a permanent rick roll is only the tip of the iceberg

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

who needs a neuralink chip when just looking at the pictures in this meme caused the song to start playing in my head

[–] BigMoe@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Never thought I’d imagine Captain Babosa as a cyber punk pirate, but here we are

[–] proper@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

epic misquote bro

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

You know the rules and so do I.

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

they tried to warn us

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

When Elon didnt want to path the xz backdoor so you get remote-rickrolled

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

This is very tame compared to what we'll actually see. Hope you're ready for goatsie burning a hole in your retinas/mind's eye.

[–] Shooie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We named the monkey Jackie!