this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
368 points (88.0% liked)

linuxmemes

24958 readers
995 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 84 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    Endeavour does it for me.

    No nonsense arch setup without any bells and whistles.

    [–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I get that. I do, however, really like how FireDragon comes with a lot of the extension I'd like to use, and with searx as the default web search. It also takes almost no time to switch to a much better KDE layout as opposed to the seemingly script kiddie dr4a6onized default.

    [–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    I wouldn’t use firedragon. It is a very outdated fork of librewolf, which is hardened even more. While librewolf is only a few days behind regular Firefox, firedragon sometimes is months behind making it a horrible choice for security.

    Edit: seems to no longer be the case

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 78 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

    EndeavourOS ftw imo

    In any case, I end up wasting all that saved time on the semiannual rewrite of my neovim config anyway.

    [–] Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 months ago
    • be satisfied with neovim config
    • see someone has created a shiny new config on github
    • add similar stuff your config
    • break everything
    • spend a week fixing everything
    • be satisfied with neovim config
    • repeat the above steps indefinitely
    [–] tourist@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    What's some neovim config you always keep?

    [–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

    Over the years of using Vim both professionally and for my own uses, I've learned to just install LunarVim and only add a handful of packages/overrides. Otherwise I just waste too much time tinkering and not doing the things I need to.

    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I usually keep most of the config. I just move them around to make it more comprehensive. The only time I made a huge change during a rewrite was when I learnt about treesitter textobjects.

    [–] jonasw@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Same until I started using helix, where my only config is adding another language server and setting a theme

    [–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

    welp, there goes my Tuesday.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] traches@sh.itjust.works 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Those two days aren’t really spent configuring, they’re spent learning.

    [–] pbsds@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    First time maybe, the second time not really

    [–] traches@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago

    second time doesn’t take two days, but yeah you’re right.

    [–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    Idk, install arch, then pull make files and dot files from git, wham bam, done how I like it on no time flat.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Learning to install Arch, now that's a transferable skill.

    [–] Laser@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    If you actually try to understand what's happening, I think it's one of the best ways to learn how a system is composed, at least if you install manually. What's a partition, file system, what does mounting do, chroots, you name it.

    I don't use Arch anymore but still think it's a great distro to learn the basics while still having the luxury of new binary packages. Manual Arch install abstracts basically nothing away from you, for better or for worse.

    Currently on NixOS, I'd say while its engineering is better overall, the things you learn there are much more distribution-specific or maybe concept-specific and often not applicable to other distributions.

    I guess there are also probably ways to install e.g. Debian manually, I've never seen instructions for it though as there was always the focus on the installer, and frankly I'm not a big fan of apt and all. It always seemed to be much more convoluted than pacman plus it does a lot of stuff for you, whether you want it or not was my impression.

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 39 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    What about just using archinstall?

    [–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 months ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] Daqu@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    That's like reaching the top of Mount Everest with oxygen and fixed ropes. You can only brag until you talk to a /real/ climber.

    [–] magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

    archinstall saves you like <15 minutes of boilerplate

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 11 months ago

    2 days?

    You guys stop configuring?

    [–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I was once checking out Garuda, because the name popped up a handful of times. Outside of the absolutely repulsive front page, the moment i saw unmarked and unexplained β€œfun scripts” in the installer, i unplugged the installer

    [–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Very fair. I'm a far cry from an advanced user - I know just enough to be dangerous to myself, and didn't see that. As I said in another comment, though, I do like that the default browser is somewhat hardened and uses a decent searx instance as the default search. It does seem to be marketed towards teenagers, though, unfortunately.

    [–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It’s not even really about how advanced you are. Using something more trustworthy, and something you can depend on, is always better. For arch(-based) distributions, i would always recommend Endeavour. Plain Arch will just do it too, if you can follow instructions as listed

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] covert_czar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 months ago
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Or you could use something stable

    [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 26 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    I Syu every other day and I literally cannot remember the last time I had to fix anything in my Arch setup (outside of initial setup)

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Arch is pretty stable and often more usable than something based on Debian from my experience fedoras better but has so many more bugs compared to arch. I chose arch because everything was broken on Debian and fedora based stuff. Leave me alone with your philosophy about "out dates software is stable software".

    Not everyone uses a ten year old system and bugs in graphical software that exist when the new version of Debian drops exists for pretty much the whole releases lifecycle from my experience and that's painful.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Debian is literally one of the most stable systems out there. It only pails in comparison to RHEL and RHEL like systems but the stability difference isn't huge. Arch on the other hand you get updates daily and they create breaking changes.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

    Arch is pretty stable

    No, it's a rolling release. Stable means that behaviours don't change during a support cycle of a major version. A rolling release can't be stable since it doesn't have major versions.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 months ago

    Two days are worth the years you're gonna spend living with that system.

    [–] lambda@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

    I installed arch last night in less than 20 minutes. The longest part was figuring out how to connect WiFi from the terminal. But I googled it and it was easy.

    [–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

    Only two days for arch btw? That's nuts.

    [–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

    Quickly having a working system vs. Quick debugging if something inevitably doesn't work.

    [–] Mango@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

    I didn't spend 20 minutes setting up Arch.

    I use Arch btw.

    [–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

    arch makes doing complex things easier though

    [–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Garuda breaking after one update

    load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί