this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
142 points (98.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10395 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/16378924

Sped up footage from Chang'e 6 lander descent

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Damn, that just feels surreal to me. I can't properly conceptualize the scale of the moon I guess

[โ€“] Ludrol@szmer.info 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Moon has fractal like surface. Big craters look like small craters and small craters look like big craters.

[โ€“] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Yup. There are no human-scale objects as a reference.

There are a few landers, yes, but if you tried to use them to gauge distance to the surface, they're so small that by the time you pick them out, it's probably too late to decelerate properly.

[โ€“] Zron@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Before Apollo 11, nasa spent a lot of time getting astronauts to try to navigate to a simulated lander out in the desert. They used explosives to make a scale version of a lunar field, dropped astronauts off, and had them try to navigate to the lander.

If I remember right, only a couple people were able to even identify where they were on the map, let alone find the lander again. Lunar surfaces are just so unnatural that human instincts about size and scale tend to get you in more trouble than not.

[โ€“] kernelle@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Such a trip, what you reckon the height was when it stopped right before landing?

[โ€“] nezbyte@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] kernelle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's so cool thanks for finding that!

[โ€“] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] Zron@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No atmosphere to diffuse the light makes things look really strange.

[โ€“] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Not to mention nothing familiar to provide scale. As I was watching I was like are we 100 km above the ground or 100 m?

I know it's sped up but that really felt like a Launchpad McQuack landing.