this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

7 readers
2 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 2 years ago
 

I wouldn't. Immortality sounds miserable to me.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MildlyMediocre@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, as long as I can control my own on/off switch for immortality.

[–] CyanCorsair@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Honestly? No. I want my death, eventually. I imagine if I did do it, I'd wind up going stir crazy before long, especially once everyone I know has passed away.

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Yes. Without a second thought.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

depends on the fine print.
it really depends on the fine print.

[–] 667@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are arguments which state that when you “transfer” consciousness, there is no continuity of consciousness, meaning we are at best making a copy and destroying the original. While your copy would wake up as though nothing happened, the original you gets destroyed in the process and never actually gets to enjoy the transference.

[–] agamemnonymous@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd much rather be a Ship-of-Theseus cyborg, replacing malfunctioning bits one at a time.

[–] 667@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Parallax@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Such a good movie, makes me want to watch it again. RIP Robin.

[–] Narrrz@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm already a robot, merely one made of biological, somewhat self- repairing components, which unfortunately are very difficult to replicate in any way besides procreation, and distinctly non- trivial to switch out even when a replacement is available. If the only thing changing is the ease with which failing parts can be replaced, then he'll yes i would. I think any sane person would, or at least should. The only reason to say no would be the assumption of certain things associated with robots as stereotyped in media, but not necessarily specified in the actual question.

[–] Cap@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It would depend on what kind of robot I'm being transferred into...

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, is the immortality mandatory, or do I get to decide when it ends?

[–] speck@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

A volcano can fix these types of immortality

[–] Gull@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, the robot has tentacles.

[–] s804@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago
[–] dominoko@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, but let's be real here. That would be for the 1% of the 1% only.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Immortality? Probably not. Transfer? Probably also no.

Yes, if it were just my brain in a resilient robot body that can take care of my brain. Particularly with nerve connection (though contextual) and being able to exist in different forms easily (different sizes/environments, buildings, digital presence). Minisub or anything in space sounds like a fun time.

VR head-space too, particularly as a personal thing for down-time (use computer, practice skills, AI personality consultation), not a digital-real-estate thing.

If it were an option (no problem of money/law) I'd sign up for cryonics testing. Though I'd definitely want an anti-dystopia contract (hopefully with some science+pro-people+pro-environment institution) and probably wouldn't want my brain to be revived in USA.