this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
113 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

40149 readers
99 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nov 5 (Reuters) - When Reuters reported in April that Tesla had scrapped plans for a long-promised, next-generation $25,000 electric vehicle, the automaker’s stock plunged. Chief Executive Elon Musk rushed to respond on X, his social-media network.

“Reuters is lying,” he posted without elaborating. Tesla’s stock recovered some of its losses.

Six months later, Musk appears to have backed into an admission that Tesla dropped its plans for a human-driven $25,000 car. He said in an Oct. 23 earnings call that building the affordable EV would be "pointless” unless the car was fully autonomous.

His latest remarks came in response to an investor asking: “When can we expect Tesla to give us the $25,000 non-robotaxi regular car model?”

Musk responded: “We’re not making a non-robo…,” before he was interrupted by another Tesla executive. Musk later added: “Basically, I think having a regular $25K model is pointless. It would be silly.”

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Translated: the Chinese won that battle, and TSLA doesn't have enough R&D to chase self-driving and cheap, esp. given how unimpressive their self driving is compared to competitors

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Just lobby to ban/tariff the competition. EZ

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Ah, all electric but still gaslighting I see

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminder to never believe a damn word that comes out of this man's mouth. https://motherfrunker.ca/fsd/

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Elonkilledmymom@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It gets boring saying the same thing over and over year after year

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Bro full self driving is 5 years away bro trust me bro"

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

$10,000 beta test

[–] smb@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

i'ld like this summary the most:

Musk now says it's 'pointless' to build a Tesla

😁

[–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Very tired of reading what Musk says.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Right, so that was his plan all along?

Keep on promising a full self driving experience, which even now won't really happen,

and then promising an affordable Tesla,

which he can then backtrack on?

Overpromise and underdeliver.

That's the Musk motto.

Can't wait to see him fail to bring humanity to Mars, and end up trying to credit himself when NASA do it.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Tesla stock is by far the most overvalued stock in the world, and its not even close.

The only thing close to it is the worthless djt stock that dictators use to funnel money to fund the poisoning of our democracy.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Musk, it's pointless listening to your bullshit, now SHUT THE FUCK UP!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Musk says a lot of stupid things.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's a weird design for a robotaxi specific car. I guess it can be cheap as a 2 seater. But other manufacturers are investing in the robotics needed for low cost cars. The aero dynamics aren't typically helpful for taxis. I understand he will try to milk existing models until FSD instead of innovating on them.