AnarchistsForKamala

joined 7 months ago
[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Soylent original.

it's so plain. I love it. I could switch to it almost entirely. I could get fat on it.

that's what this post is, but it's not what caused the ban

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

having multiple fediverse accounts is not bannable, and ad hominem is itself bad faith. calling it out is not.

they said fight, not hope

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (7 children)

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but we don't know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it's an interesting theory and we can test it!!

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it's intentionally vague. build an affinity group and assess your capabilities.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

your assertion isn't that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

ok well if you don't have any evidence I'm going to dismiss your conclusion.

view more: next ›