AntiOutsideAktion

Them: "you aren't well versed in this subject, here is an interview with an author and I recommend you look at his articles"

You: "LOL YOU DIDN'T GIVE ME A PAGE NUMBER AND PARAGRAPH"

Shut the fuck up you fucking idiot. Cynically misusing a concept in a context it doesn't apply just so you can be fucking lazy and bad faith.

Okay then you explain why the only acceptable position with regards to genocide is voting for the most maximalist version of it

.nazi

Insane.

You supported a genocide.

looks out their window at explicit fascism at a global high point unmatched in any period of history considering how unopposed it is

Oh gosh what if communists put me in jail for being a nazi 😱

Anyway, good for you not ignoring politics I suppose

And my position is that you're a lazy piece of shit crybaby who can't argue in good faith. You can't accept someone saying "I remember reading it in this book" without jumping down their throat and demanding they do work for you for no other purpose than for you to smugly ignore what they say. Fuck you.

You were born stupid and you're going to die stupid.

I mean don’t take my word for it, see how internet arguments generally work out there in internet.

Delusional. You look. Who out there is using more strict citation rules than academic papers?

You don’t have to live like a fucking weasel trying to sidestep arguments with “but you didn’t give me a timestamp” and “lol u mad” all the time. You can just shut the fuck up, you know.

I stand by these words and add to them: Fuck you tone policing. Go fuck yourself a second time for the behavior I called out here. Punk ass.

I'll keep that in mind as I occasionally chew through it. I never really watched it at the time.

Oh wow I didn't know I was being visited by his holiness the arbiter of how online arguments should and do work. And by holy decree you've asserted that it works however allows you to be the laziest, most bad faith and anti-intellectual.

I have an idea of how things should work: either engage or don't. You don't have to live like a fucking weasel trying to sidestep arguments with "but you didn't give me a timestamp" and "lol u mad" all the time. You can just shut the fuck up, you know.

Doing these things doesn't make you more right. Just the opposite.

You don't need to clarify anything; you're just being wrongheaded. First, just because YOU'RE a freak hitting F5 until your finger breaks doesn't mean asynchronous text is a 'faster' medium. No one's forcing you to talk out of your ass. No one's forcing you to respond as fast as you can. You have permission to stop replying if the person you're arguing with is better read than you and you want to incorporate their knowledge base into your own. And if you don't you're saying that your ignorance is as valuable as their knowledge.

Why would you expect someone to read something just because someone said "I got this information from here"? My child, no one expects you to do that. They expect you to take their word for it. And if you are so hostile as to be motivated to accuse them of lying, you take on the exercise of exposing them.

I'm astounded by how doggedly you're asserting your lazy entitlement.

If it’s not fine on a study or thesis, why would you think it’s fine in a fast paced short form internet argument?

Impossible to take you seriously when you don't have a moment's dissonance saying shit like this. "If it's not correct in context A it shouldn't be correct in context B which is almost exactly opposite to what context A looks like"

You aren't even attempting the mental gymnastics. You're just saying 2+2 = 5 without added effort.

No, you're the one coping out by both refusing to engage in good faith AND refusing to do the work of fact checking if you want to be so pedantic and skeptical. You want to have it both ways. And in the end the result is always you ignoring information and arguments you don't like. If you're not invested enough in your objection to skim through 15 minutes of transcript you shouldn't be invested enough to keep flapping your mouth in ignorance of it.