Archangel1313

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 55 points 2 days ago

Guy's probably already dead.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

Of course he does. That's how it works. You show him that you're weak, and he'll keep taking advantage of you.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

So, they're shutting down actual research in order to rehash this bullshit for the hundredth time?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oops. There goes the US communications tech industry, I guess.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 67 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So, is he seriously telling other countries not to just blindly go along with whatever the US tells them to do, but instead to resist and stand up for themselves?

And Trump is ok with this messaging? Hmmm.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Can we not just use the original definition, instead? It worked fine for decades, until right-wingers decided to reinvent it in order to push their propaganda.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Oh, I didn't mean to imply that they should "always" be prosecuted for their crimes...only that the Supreme Court should have closed that loophole. There are many ways they could have drawn a distinction between justified actions and those that should be prosecuted.

Instead, they ruled that all "official acts" should be exempt from repercussions. That didn't just leave the loophole open...it guaranteed it could be abused, without consequence.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

Are those slightly charred beets?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Ooh, ooh...I did that.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Is this his latest effort to convince us he's not like Trump?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (7 children)

But we did vote our way into it, didn't we?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›