Archangel1313

joined 1 month ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's like saying they'll be charged with murder, for reporting on murder. These fucking halfwits are just so unbelievably stupid.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

That catch-22 works both ways. Once there are more progressives in power, the effect will begin to reverse. I'm old enough to see it already happening. It's just a slow shift.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a representative democracy...which means you need to flip seats in Congress in order to take over a party. That's all. It's a gradual process, but one that is entirely possible within the current system. We the people, have the power to do this, just by voting.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The biggest problem is, that progressives are fighting against the money. Tea Party Republicans didn't have that problem, since most of their socio-political ideology aligns with Libertarian policies. No taxes, no regulations, no corporate accountability. That draws a lot of support from the kinds of people who were already dissatisfied with the compromise Democrats and Republicans had struck between the elites making more money, and the consumers they use to make it.

The Tea Party and later MAGA are all in on fucking us all over to benefit the ruling class. Most of their voters are just too gullible to realize that. They think they're somehow "sticking it to the elites", by giving them everything they could have ever hoped for.

In many ways, it was never a real grassroots movement. It was always just an astroturfed effort. But it demonstrates how you can fundamentally change the entire direction of a party in US politics. One seat at a time...until the new majority votes the way you want them to.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

They didn't have a single populist in the beginning. They just had "Tea Party Republicans". Unfortunately, this new "flavor" of conservative was even more racist and unintelligent than the original recipe.

Their voters immediately gravitated towards them, because they were seen as relatable outsiders, whose biggest policy position was to do whatever it took to hurt "the left", and/or anyone who even suggested the idea of "working together" with them. (ie. RINOs)

Trump just eventually took advantage of this movement and declared himself its leader. But when it first started, he still considered himself a Democrat.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Two sides of the same coin.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Of course you can. Just look at how the MAGA movement has taken over the Republican party. It started during Obama's term, with the Tea Party movement. One-by-one, they primaried the old-school moderate Republicans, and eventually held majority control over their party's policy decisions. Once they had that, the remaining moderates either chose to fall in line, or were forced to retire.

That's how democracy works. Revolution is just an excuse to kill people for their political beliefs, when you're too lazy to convince them to change their minds.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

That's a very fair point.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then their losses are on them...not the voters.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except that white folks aren't "excluded" from anything. You would have to be an idiot to think that white people aren't already receiving the full benefit of everything that society has to offer. This doesn't need to be "advertised". it's simply a fact.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

"I will succeed, where they could not."

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Regardless, if Carney doesn’t break this unambiguous election promise, that’s not a cause for celebration or congratulations. He could’ve passed a bill to protect supply management - was asked directly to do so - and he intentionally didn’t do it.

Then what's this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›