Bougie_Birdie

"There's no way we evolved from monkeys, and I'll prove it: humans are good at holding bananas!"

Can't make this stuff up

Most things work great out of the box these days. If you do your gaming through Steam already then it's the easiest it could be. Otherwise you can download some other platform like Lutris to manage your compatibility for you

There are definite exceptions though. There's this great website ProtonDB that tells you how compatible games are if you want to look before you leap.

Kernel-level anticheat can make some games unplayable on Linux. Basically, it's intended to detect cheaters, but it gives false positives on Linux. On the flip side, the software is super invasive, like once you're aware of how it works it will make you wonder why anybody would allow that shit on their computer. Probably because they don't know any better, but still. This is more of a problem with high budget PvP games like Call of Duty, so depending on your taste you may never encounter it

Hardware for the most part seems to just work through plug and play. However, if your stuff is highly customizable through software - like Razer Synapse/Chroma/whatever they call it these days - you may not have access to all the features.

Most Linux installers give you the option to just try out the OS in a non-permanent environment. So you could find a distro that appeals to you and then give it a test run without comitting to a full installation. It'd be a good way to see if there's any hardware or compatibility issues.

If you have an Intel/Nvidia rig and are thinking about gaming, I recommend pop_os! I've been using it for a few years now and I have no complaints.

Only on the fediverse can I expect to see someone explain how to manage their kitchen with a computer analogy and not the other way around

It's good advice though, I have no notes

I think it's historic, I suspect the letter grades predate using GPA

To be honest, I didn't even know we did GPA at all until after I got my high school transcript for applying to college. Our report cards gave us our percentage and a letter for each course

As the meme suggests, the whole system is pointless and frankly kind of foolish

We have them in Canada, I assume they work the same:

When your work is assessed, you get a letter grade in the range from A-F. E is absent, although some regions will use E instead of F. Your letter grade is determined by your percentage.

Letter grades aren't super useful to show your overall results, and are difficult to average, so they can be converted back into numbers. You start at 0 for F, then skip over E to get to D which is worth 1.0, C is 2.0, etc. GPA doesn't go higher than 4.0 at A, or 85%, so there's actually quite a lot of margin for error to allow people the maximum GPA if they test well.

Oh, and your letters might get a + or - to show you're on the high or low end of a grade. There's a lot of range between a C and a B, but C+ is close to B-. A + is worth 0.3 on your GPA, and a - is worth -0.3

Also, your letter grades and therefore numeric GPA is a non-linear scale, and the conversion for what percentage converts to which letter might differ depending on the institution, school district, or region.

Isn't it so simple?

Valedictorian is a bit easier to understand. At graduation, one student is selected to be Valedictorian, and their function is to give a speech at the graduation ceremony.

Traditionally, it's the "highest performing" student, but GPA caps out at 4.0 which means that two students with an 87% and 98% average have the same GPA and are therefore equal. Their social achievements are then considered, so the valedictorian will usually be someone who was very active in extracurricular clubs or sports.

Basically Valedictorian is usually the most popular student who got straight As.

Unfortunately, it looks like drawing a big rectangle is the only method to calculate area that's baked into Godot. You could get the Area2D's CollisionShape2D children, and then for each child you can child.shape.get_rect().get_area()

Now, if you're getting each shape anyway, and you know what kind of shape it is, you can use the appropriate formula to calculate area. For instance, if it's a CircleShape2D, you can check the radius and get something like var area = shape.radius * shape.radius * PI

For a polygon it becomes more complicated. You can get the points of the polygon and then use Geometry2D.triangulate_polygon() to get an array of triangles inside that polygon. You can then calculate the area of each triangle and sum them to get your total area. There's no built-in way to do this, so it's left as an exercise for you.

The question I have to ask: from a design standpoint, is the exact size of each country truly important to the game? For the sake of argument, Canada is a really quite large country, but it's sparsely populated. A lot of the land is frankly not very habitable. If I was going to abstract a surrender-factor, I'd think about "population" filling a role that you're thinking of for "area." If that were the case, you could just attach a property to each country manually. Maybe a little more work upfront depending on how many countries or regions you're including, but it's definitely cognitively simpler.

It's a common turn of phrase that people use when explaining something to someone who seems unclear on a subject.

I hope this clears things up.

The market is saturated with crap that doesn't sell under its own merits. In theory a review signals that not only did that product sell, but somebody actually cared enough to leave a review.

An online market is especially tricky for consumers because you can't really look at the product to judge it for yourself. You have to make do with a product description, specifications, or photos. All of which might be incomplete, poorly translated, or photoshopped / AI-generated.

So reviews tell you what other people thought. It's their first line of marketing after SEO (Search Engine Optimization). Of course, unethical companies are out there using paid and fake reviews, so it's not like a savvy shopper can even use the reviews to judge quality.

Anyway, as someone else said, don't engage with these emails. You'll just end up with more emails if you do.

Oh neat, so they act like human doctors

Considering the cube

HtWFaIP - How to Win Friends and Influence People

Bad person, probably not. That's a harsh descriptor to apply for a single transgression.

I'd call this behaviour to avoid though. Most people don't like being lied to or ghosted

Sometimes you can't really avoid it, like if safety is a concern. But if you lie and ghost because feelings are messy then it causes other people to have messy feelings