Bravo

joined 2 days ago
[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been deleted so don't blame lemmy

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 day ago

Not all job creation is a net benefit to the public interest. Wars give lots of people jobs.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago

I assume that's a reference to the intro screen to Mario 64 where you can pull and deform Mario'd face.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Tankie" means "person who, in a confrontation between citizens and tanks, roots for the tanks". It's more a reference to a person's underlying authoritarianism rather than communism per se. The main reason it's conflated with communism/marxism is because capitalism has, conceptually, staked a claim to the protectorship of individualism, which is assumed to be desirable. And because this claim is unchallenged, anything which stands against capitalism is assumed to therefore be inherently authoritarian. There is some merit to this claim and these assumptions, but to what extent, I couldn't say. I'm not that smart.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the implication is actually that there's a marked dropoff of eligible young Russian men. To preserve a generation, Russia might soon need to use more North Koreans on the Ukrainian front, but that comes with its own problems and risks.

It's weird that Putin's avoiding peace negotiations, as he more than anyone needs to find a way to scale back the war effort before his hold on power begins to waver. I get that he needs to save face while doing so, but he's not gonna get conditions more favorable than a Trump administration, so the clock is ticking.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

China will help repopulate Russia. Forcibly.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago

I can't understand the filing. Did Llama not pay James Earl Jones's estate?

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 11 points 1 day ago

Page 21 of the ruling:

First, the Enforcement Guidance contravenes Title VII's plain text by expanding the scope of "sex" beyond the biological binary: male and female. Although Title VII defines "sex" to also include "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions," §2000e(k), the Enforcement Guidance concludes that "sex" under Title VII "includes 'pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions' and sexual orientation and gender identity." Enforcement Guidance, §I(A)(5) (emphasis added). Notably, the Guidance uses quotation marks around "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions"—but not "sexual orientation" or "gender identity." Because neither the plain text of Title VII nor Supreme Court precedent defines Title VII "sex" this broadly. Thus, the Enforcement Guidance lacks statutory or jurisprudential authority to expand Title VII's definition of "sex" to include these new categories.

Interestingly, this also seems to provide a legal basis to discriminate against straight people and cis people. It'll be interesting to see how Republicans attempt to close that extra loophole without also closing the loophole for discrimination against LGBTQ people.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago

What about punching people you work with? When is that acceptable?

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I ask - what's this about the filming conditions for Terminator Salvation requiring specific timing and being dangerous? This is the first I've heard of that.

view more: next ›