Chapelgentry

joined 2 years ago
[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Haha oh boy. Good luck to that guy in that struggle. Can't wait for the arguments around them stealing his car since there's no lien

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I legitimately don't understand what's happening here - was his car repossessed or something?

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gotdammit I love you. Your responses to that douche warm my heart.

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Gum gum pisser?

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw both this pic and your bikini one - you don't need to worry at all about how you look. Seriously!

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Impressive body! Be proud of it because it's 🔥

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Real talk here. My company used McKinsey in the utilities sector and they were paid millions to come in and lean out our processes. The result was that half of the consultants got moved to other projects, our internal processes got fucked with no clear improvement, and McKinsey walked away with millions. Their biggest contribution was death by PowerPoint.

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great gas mileage if you don't mind the road noise

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As someone who has worked for a number of transmission companies, $1.3 Billion dollars is a laughable investment. Duke Energy spent the better part of last year trying to find $54 Billion for it's capital investment projects.

Most electric transmission companies in the US spend this much on capital projects on an annual basis. I like the idea of investing in our infrastructure but this is money wasted

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I use a combination of ESPN+ and Sportsurge to stream all the games I want to watch.

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I thought as I was watching it, but I thought it was some 5D chess thing that I was too dumb to see. I thought, "they're gonna need two more field goals or another touchdown anyway."

The ONLY thing I can think of is that they were thinking too far ahead and assumed the TD+2 was in the bag and wanted to prevent a FG loss. Even then that's a HUGE assumption.

Yeah, you said it best. It makes ZERO fucking sense.

[–] Chapelgentry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can anyone explain why the raiders opted for a field goal there instead of going for it?

view more: next ›