ChemicalRascal

joined 2 years ago
[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh, you're not wrong, I'm sure it'll all shake out relatively quickly.

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It actually kinda does ruin something. Beehaw was setting itself up to have the defacto communities for a bunch of topics.

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This only solves the problem for you. It doesn't solve the problem for the community, nor does it scale well (if everyone does it, then you're just gonna repeat the same dance over and over).

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Hot take — maybe it was Beehaw that was getting too big too quickly, then?

They decided to take on an enormous workload, running so many communities, communities that then became the defacto standard communities for those topics.

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Excuse me but the only people we eat around here are the rich.

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That seemed to be a situation where the head mod was going against the wishes of the other mods. Not sure how I feel about it, personally, but it's not quite as simple as "Spez made the subreddit open against the wishes of everyone involved".

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's arguably a sign that there is need for refinement, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, jeez. Every platforms' early days were much like this. Reddit was pretty shit at first. YouTube was pretty shit at first. And so on.

Nothing comes to life without teething pains. We're literally on day two for most users, it's bizarre to be saying anything about Lemmy's future this early.

[–] ChemicalRascal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The IPO is everything, I'm sure. So much of any valuation is entirely speculative, but the higher that speculation is the more money the stakeholders will be able to get out when they sell.

Presumably spez is a major stakeholder, and if so, a short-term inflation of particular usage metrics would directly mean more dollars in his pocket when they sell. It doesn't matter if it then all falls over in a heap, if the monetisation isn't actually viable; he (and others) have already cashed out, and the folks who bought into the valuation are left holding the bag.