They don't construct arguments the same way normal thinking people do, they start with the conclusion and just make up whatever as a reason for it and hope people buy it.
DivineDev
joined 2 weeks ago
And that's why you don't do racist, sexist or pedo jokes online. No matter how obviously non serious you think you are, some idiot will agree with you.
Edit: added missing word
Just keep it up, he has trouble controlling himself when he's angry and might just accidentally let something slip
DON'T OPEN THE BOX WHEN IT ARRIVES this is a keter class object, also don't move we're sending someone to help you
why not white
Probably took them 3 tries to line up in the correct order
In German there's the saying "macht Sinn", which is wrong since it's just a direct translation of "makes sense". Correct would be "ergibt Sinn", in English "results in sense", but I don't care, "macht Sinn" rolls off the tongue easier.
Klingt doch nach einem top Argument für Homeoffice für die klassischerweise konservativen Wähler auf dem Land. Dann haben junge Leute zumindest einem Grund weniger die Gegend zu meiden.
Up until the communism part I thought they were endorsing him.
I think that's just called stealing
It could just be a bug bite, but I'm hoping he punched a wall in anger over the Epstein files.
view more: next ›
Sure, if you have a novel result, say from some experiment, you afterwards come up with theories to explain it. This is different from policy decisions though, where you have a situation at hand and need to come up with a way to deal with it.
In this case:
There's an epidemic, we need to contain it
-> it spreads through viruses expelled be sneezing
-> use a mask to hinder the spread
vs
People tell me to use masks, I don't like that -> I need a reason to justify not wearing a mask
-> "I can't breathe!!"