DivineDev

...so you're saying we need to deploy bots to spam photos of Trump with Epstein to conservative forums?

Sure, if you have a novel result, say from some experiment, you afterwards come up with theories to explain it. This is different from policy decisions though, where you have a situation at hand and need to come up with a way to deal with it.

In this case:

There's an epidemic, we need to contain it
-> it spreads through viruses expelled be sneezing
-> use a mask to hinder the spread

vs

People tell me to use masks, I don't like that -> I need a reason to justify not wearing a mask
-> "I can't breathe!!"

They don't construct arguments the same way normal thinking people do, they start with the conclusion and just make up whatever as a reason for it and hope people buy it.

And that's why you don't do racist, sexist or pedo jokes online. No matter how obviously non serious you think you are, some idiot will agree with you.

Edit: added missing word

Just keep it up, he has trouble controlling himself when he's angry and might just accidentally let something slip

DON'T OPEN THE BOX WHEN IT ARRIVES this is a keter class object, also don't move we're sending someone to help you

why not white

Probably took them 3 tries to line up in the correct order

In German there's the saying "macht Sinn", which is wrong since it's just a direct translation of "makes sense". Correct would be "ergibt Sinn", in English "results in sense", but I don't care, "macht Sinn" rolls off the tongue easier.

Klingt doch nach einem top Argument für Homeoffice für die klassischerweise konservativen Wähler auf dem Land. Dann haben junge Leute zumindest einem Grund weniger die Gegend zu meiden.

Up until the communism part I thought they were endorsing him.

I think that's just called stealing