The author of this opinion article, Richard Kemp, is known for..., Well, I recommend the "Politics" section of his wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kemp.
The fact that he does not want (his) soldiers to be investigated for war crimes gives me a great pause about his opinions.
Beautiful! Thank you
Will not login to Twitter to see a video. What would be a good alternative for posters?
Putin can say whatever he wants, unchallenged, to justify himself and take the Russian troops out of Ukraine.
“This day [Feb 24, 1835], the 24th instant, and the day following, at the North Side of the Custom-House [in Charlestone], at 11 o’clock, will be sold, a very valuable GANG OF NEGROES, accustomed to the culture of rice; consisting of SIX HUNDRED.”
To many people today would have us go back.
Thanks for the post! Specially the summary!
Also, why does Russia not have loads of troops near the border with Finland?
Surely, if NATO is such a threat. Why?
"Oral treaty", oral international treaty.... now that sounds like a heavily manipulative level of naivety.
Where does it says so? Can you point to that specific section of the text? I've just checked and must have missed it, it wasn't there.
Russia invaded Ukraine. Invaded. And occupied. With weapons. With murder and torture. And child abduction. And declarations that Ukraine as country, culture and people, should not exist.
That is unjustifiable.
Puppy Linux on my already-not-fast-2011 laptop. Many thanks to the Devs on keeping my machine alive! True miracle makers!