You specifically made out that Musk would want this censorship, which flies against every action we have seen from him.
FreedomAdvocate
joined 2 weeks ago
The government isn’t invading.
The President of the USA decides if there is an invasion or predatory incursion, that’s the point. Not congress, not you - the president.
How did they bend the knee to musk is what I’m asking.
It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.
You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.
No it’s not.
It fully drives itself, but legally you need to “supervise” it. It’s called that because of the laws around driving a car.
Companies can say whatever they want in their fine print but it’s not legally binding. If you want to do a class action over this, go for it.
They’ve “figured out” lane-keeping - they’re just keeping it reserved for FSD. It’s in FSD. They’re just now flipping to not offer it as a standalone feature, which don’t get me wrong is a shitty move.
Only a fool buys something on the promise of future upgrades and potential. Buy stuff on what it is now.
This is a bad look for Tesla for sure, but no one should be going “I wouldn’t have bought it if I knew this would get cancelled”.