Hawk

joined 2 years ago
[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See also Mull, No 120hz though.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

Also, I don't think one can export bookmarks from Android Firefox either.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago

Some js is a bit slower. I typically use chrome for self hosted apps, jupyter etc.

I think wasm performance is actually better in Firefox though.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see we have the same managers. Were you also advised that public facing databases were better than an API in a VPC and that 1 password shared among colleagues is easier than managing credentials?

Don't worry, I found a new gig starting in a few weeks (out of the pot into pan )

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago

As always the answer is it depends.

Ive seen a lot of merchants of illicit products move towards sessions.

It depends on your threat model, signal or maybe element is likely the best compromise.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 days ago

I've done things like this with python. It's not too hard and one can use local models.

You can even control the length of the output using pydantic and other checks.

I've had good success scraping and annotating links from forums etc. Into bookmarks for research.

Very convenient!

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Set up wireguard in a docker container and then forward the port to wireguard, the default container on docker hub is fairly straightforward and you can always ask me for help if you need :).

However, If you are using ipv4, you need to make sure that you're not behind a CG-NAT (If you think you might be, call your ISP and tell them you have security cameras that need to get out or something like that).

You could also try tailscale which is built using wireguard with nat-busting features and a bit easier to configure (I dont personally use it as wireguard is sufficient for me).

After that Caddy + DNSMasq will simply allow you to map different URLs to IP addresses

  • dnsmasq
    • will let you map, E.g. my_computer -> 192.168.1.64
  • Caddy (Or nginx, but caddy is simpler)
    • will let you map to ports so e.g.:
      • with DNS (DNSMasq as above)
        • http://dokuwiki.my_computer -> http://my_computer:8080
      • Without DNS
        • http://dokuwiki.192.168.1.64 -> http://192.168.1.64:8080/

Caddy and DNSmasq are superfluous, if you've got a good memory or bookmarks, you don't really need them.

VPN back into home is a lot more important. You definitely do not want to be forwarding ports to services you are running, because if you don't know what you're doing this could pose a network security risk.

Use the VPN as the entry point, as it's secure. I also recommend running the VPN in a docker / podman container on an old laptop dedicated just to that, simply to keep it as isolated as you can.

Down the line you could also look into VLan If your router supports that.

I personally would not bother with SSL If you're just going to be providing access to trusted users who already have access to your home network.

If you are looking to host things, just pay for a digital droplet for $7 a month, It's much simpler, You still get to configure everything but you don't expose your network to a security risk.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If you're just going to VPN in to your home network, I've found caddy to be the simplest.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's fairly well documented and the up to date packages are very convenient.

It can also be pretty confusing installing debian and having to find how to install packages that aren't out of date.

Imo take a few hours to power through the wiki installation guide and it's really not too bad + you're equipped to fix issues as they arise. It's not Gentoo. When Ubuntu breaks for a new user, it's a nightmare too.

So I think I disagree, it's been easier to use than Fedora, Mint, Debian, Ubuntu, Elementary in my experience. I use Gentoo too but that is indeed simple in the challenging sense.

Arch is a nice middle ground between Ubuntu and Gentoo.

Plus, with EndeavourOS users can have their cake and eat it too.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The community could certainly be kinder.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

There's nothing on Reddit anymore. It's really unfortunate but I don't see how this is going to help them regain any consistent user base.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've had a poor experience with btrfs dedupe tbh (and a terrible experience with qgroups), however, this was years ago. Btrfs snapshots I prefer though, much easier not to have that dependence.

What distro are you using for ZFS, void?

view more: next ›