Quite certain it is not a CGI, doing this good of a CGI would be more expensive than just getting some to fly the helicopter.
The "too stable" comments do not realize that two vehicles filming each other with roughly same speed just look stable.
If you would fake it, the camera would have not done those rotations etc, because that makes CGI much more complex. And there is no faked camera shake/zooms/focus changes that in general happen in all faked videos.
The government should take care of it's people
Well, as a Finn I am not too keen, our weather will turn to Siberian style winter...
But because the heat doesn't move, some parts might become so hot that nothing lives there.
We already know that Israeli cyber company has spyware called pegasus, that can 0-click attacks to ios and Android. It is one time hack, and it is removed on boot. They sell it as service. This is why cyber security centers recommend boot once a day.
HK-47 agrees with the meatbag
Yes, and in middle ages they loved to torture and mutilate people
Nordic energy market is capped between -0,5€ - 2,00€/kWh (upper limit might go up if needed). Average market price for last 30days was 0,05€/kWh, which is fairly normal. Price currently is per hour, but market will change to 15min next year.
In Finland, we pay distribution separately, it is commonly 0,02€-0,05€/kWh, depending on the grid company.
On top of that there is electricity tax which is 0,03€/kWh.
Total is something around 0,12-0,15snt/kWh.
I work at electricity distribution, can confirm, we never have any issues, it is evil spirits, not us.
I can guarantee there is no design yet at all, the whole shit is just vaporware, like all musk's demos. That demo 100% has driver in the van in the front.
Edit: note that this part of the thread is about the bus. The robotaxi is definitely just CGI shit, no real engineer has even looked at the design yet.
The driver that is driving the vehicle because musk will not be able to deliver the FSD.
Front is were the driver is
I am using same solution, and getting right count with test input, but the actual input gives too many.
Annoying, and really hard to debug. I made renderer to visualize, but unable to find the bug.
One misunderstanding was that I counted same walls twice, because the result should not count same added wall twice if it has same x,y.