This map underrepresents emissions from NPPs. The emissions that are assumed for nuclear are lower than everything you find in literature and are 1/5th to 1/10th of what reputable sources state. That being said, this map is otherwise a great resource and i like it very much.
Hugohase
joined 1 year ago
I don't agree with you but either way that doesn't change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.
There are just better/faster options...
Die Rechtskonservativen und die Rechtsextremen ergo "die Rechten".
Das Lied ist 2004 rausgekommen... Da hätt man noch recht chillig und recht billig alles in die richtigen Bahnen lenken können. Vielen Dank an die rechten Arschlöcher für die zerstörung unserer Lebensgrundlage.
If this is ever deemed feasible the world will already run on renewables. There might have been a time for NPPs but 2024 ain't it.
TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1
Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...
This is happening, to a degree, in most of Europe. Storage is the answer as described in the article. Unfortunately politics are not proactive, you need to break the system before something happens... and now the system is broken, yeah!!!
Yeah, but they are...
Love EVs, hate Musk... not sure how to feel :-/
Put as much money into the research of SMRs as you would like to waste. Meanwhile we just build a cheaper, better and more reliable system based on renewables.
This will happen with or without the nukebro hypetrain.
It will take some time but I will answer with sources. Can you post the source used in the map i have never been able to find anything that came close.