III

joined 2 years ago
[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Sadly, they get everything they voted for and so does everyone else. They "are fine" with people suffering, and because of this everyone else is forced to suffer and/or watch other suffer.

They deserve more bad things than what they voted for. Fuck them.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but the selfishness lies in how he claims he will be fine, without regard for others. Selfish. He isn't either selfish or ignorant, he is both.

[–] III@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Regarding sympathy - he is no different than the others who voted for this. These kinds of people aren't ready to have been wrong. So they claim they expected it. His reply is nothing but an attempt to cope with his bad choices.

[–] III@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both and probably a lot more. He's pretty confident that this won't affect him too much. I am sure the leopards continue to circle for a second pass at him.

[–] III@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The problem is that their propaganda machine news sources tell them that DEI means they will hire the lesser, minority applicant over the much, much better white applicant just because they are a minority. The issue is "perception" (in that their perception has been curated for them). You could get every last one of them (save the truly racist) to agree to a system that could be proven to remove race from an identifiable attribute in hiring, not that this is possible in every situation. Sadly, they have been trained to believe that is not the goal for DEI.

[–] III@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The reason these people can't comprehend lack of belief is because they are stuck thinking god is a default state - that it requires belief to assert it isn't real. When in fact the concept of god is no different than every other deity, Greek god, unicorn, space teapot... you name it. It is nothing more than a regionally popular unfalsifiable claim. They can't wrap their minds around who the burden of proof falls on.

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't this the same justification that America used to send factory jobs overseas? I feel repeating verbatim what the US has stated is the ultimate sign of respect.

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here I was thinking the ratio was also a problem with that math. Full...?

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

To be fair, enough lithium would essentially tranquilize a horse...

[–] III@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Some people just don't live theater, that doesn't mean people are wrong for liking it as a film. And I would posit that the majority of the hype you are seeing for the film is because of its history as a Broadway hit.

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Just another "first they came for..." thing with the rich. As soon as they put all the homeless into for-profit labor camp prisons, the poor are next.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

If his data driven claims aren't just complete bullshit, the data he is talking about tells him that saying this type of shit will get him something he wants. Whether homelessness is real doesn't matter to him.

If his data driven claims are bullshit, he probably saw a homeless person who didn't look exactly like a Hollywood movie homeless person so, per his tiny, tiny idiot brain, they must be faking homelessness.

view more: next ›