JumpyWombat

The study wanted to highlight the bias, not to recommend ChatGTP’s advice

Of course, but in this case “being an alternative” really depends on the goal. To produce content they may be all valid, to monetise content there will be differences, but to consume content none is really comparable to YouTube.

The problem is to use LLMs for the wrong things expecting correct answers.

I do not believe that LLMs will ever be able to replace humans in tasks designed for humans. The reason is that human tasks require tacit knowledge (=job experience) and that stuff is not written down in training material.

However, we will start to have tasks for LLMs pretty soon. It was already observed that LLMs work better on stuff produced by other LLMs.

There is also Vimeo.

However, none of these is a true alternative to YouTube in terms of content.

It’s neither. LLMs are statistical models: if the training material contains bias (women get lower salaries) the output will reflect that bias.

You’re right of course. However, is letting Israel kill some hundreds of civilians every week really an option?

There is a long list of alternatives that starts with a military intervention to stop the genocide, and ends with relocating the refugees in other countries as the minimum act of decency. Somehow the world manages to go to the bottom of the list and digs down choosing to just watch.

I wonder how this will be explained in history books.

This is ridiculous. There was no hesitation to intervene with weapons, troops, and sanctions in other conflicts in defense of the attacked, but with Israel nobody goes beyond words.

If the world lets Israel take Gaza, I do not understand why there is no action to relocate the Palestinians and avoid the massacre at least.