MothBookkeeper

joined 2 years ago
[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So what does he want to be called? Just a rat? But - there are actual rats, which are already called rats. Unless those don't exist in this universe, "ratman" seems like a pretty reasonable term. He has both rat and humanoid features.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I came here to post this. Glad to see it's where it needs to be.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Definitely! Though I would say avoiding purposeful harm to their ego should be more than a nice gesture. That's just basic respect. Trying to avoid accidental harm, sure.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You already kinda said it—this is a problem with the relationship with your boss, not with the book.

With my boss, I can just say, "Honestly, this one was a miss for me. I appreciate the recommendation, and I wanted to give it a chance, but I didn't find much actionable substance in it. What did you get out of it?"

If you don't feel like you can do that, have a conversation with him about how he likes to receive feedback. If the answer is "he doesn't," it might be time to go boss shopping. But I doubt that will be the case.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The sound... the sound haunts my dreams

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

jackie_chan_wat.jpg

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (11 children)

How is this unpopular? The company wouldn't exist if people didn't like eating there.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yes. I am among the number that prefers it the way it is.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"I may not know much."

That is a complete sentence.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It could absolutely be implemented by Sync.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You fucking donkey, did you read their comment before you replied to it? They aren't doing it just because they want to; there are legal implications.

 
 

Would we hunt them?

 

For the weekly challenge

 
 
 
 

money under mout runnin

...

oh SHIT

OH GAWD

JESUS

JESUS

JESUS

LORD JESUS

LORD JESUS

OH JESUS CHRIST

OHH

OHHHH

JESUS

OH LAWD JESUS

LAWD JESUS

OHHH SHIT

WOOOOWW WOOOOOOOW

THAT WAS AWESOME

THAT WAS AWESOME RIGHT THERE

WOOOOOOW SHIT

OH OOOOOOOH LAWD JESUS

OH JESUS

GET THE WATER

JESUS CHRIST

LAWD HAVE MERCY

GET THE WATER IT'S GOING DOWN

AWWW DEM MOTHERFUCKING BOOTLEG FIREWORKS

SHIT

OH SHIT

HOOOO SHIT

WOOOOOOOH!

 

money under mout runnin

...

oh SHIT

OH GAWD

JESUS

JESUS

JESUS

LORD JESUS

LORD JESUS

OH JESUS CHRIST

OHH

OHHHH

JESUS

OH LAWD JESUS

LAWD JESUS

OHHH SHIT

WOOOOWW WOOOOOOOW

THAT WAS AWESOME

THAT WAS AWESOME RIGHT THERE

WOOOOOOW SHIT

OH OOOOOOOH LAWD JESUS

OH JESUS

GET THE WATER

JESUS CHRIST

LAWD HAVE MERCY

GET THE WATER IT'S GOING DOWN

AWWW DEM MOTHERFUCKING BOOTLEG FIREWORKS

SHIT

OH SHIT

HOOOO SHIT

WOOOOOOOH!

11
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world to c/videos@lemmy.world
 

money under mout runnin

...

oh SHIT

OH GAWD

JESUS

JESUS

JESUS

LORD JESUS

LORD JESUS

OH JESUS CHRIST

OHH

OHHHH

JESUS

OH LAWD JESUS

LAWD JESUS

OHHH SHIT

WOOOOWW WOOOOOOOW

THAT WAS AWESOME

THAT WAS AWESOME RIGHT THERE

WOOOOOOW SHIT

OH OOOOOOOH LAWD JESUS

OH JESUS

GET THE WATER

JESUS CHRIST

LAWD HAVE MERCY

GET THE WATER IT'S GOING DOWN

AWWW DEM MOTHERFUCKING BOOTLEG FIREWORKS

SHIT

OH SHIT

HOOOO SHIT

WOOOOOOOH!

 

In RIF, any time someone posted a YouTube video or a GIF from various GIF hosting sites, that was displayed directly in the feed, rather than needing to open the link. For articles, it would also choose an image from the article and embed that in the feed, so you could quickly get a sense of what the article was about as you were scrolling.

This is what I'm missing the most from RIF, more so than any button or setting, because it IS the core experience of browsing content in the app. It would open up Lemmy to a whole world of dynamic content, rather than just images and text posts.

I'm guessing this is also one of the more time consuming features to implement, and to that I say—devs, I don't have the skills to help you with this, but I will pay you for it. Right now, it's a barrier to fully enjoying Lemmy as much as Reddit, and I want to stick it to Reddit that badly. DM me if you're interested.

PS: All this is built on the assumption that this is a client-side problem. If it's not, I'll welcome a correction.

 

Welcome to Lemmy! Here's a simple guide for those migrating.

Lemmy is pretty much Reddit, with one major difference—it has instances. Imagine you could take all of Reddit's backend server code, copy and paste it, and host your own version of Reddit. Cool! Now you're an admin of Reddit 2. If the CEO of Reddit 1 ever does something mind-numbingly stupid, you and your users will be unaffected*. Reddit 1 and Reddit 2 are akin to Lemmy instances. Each instance has their own users and communities (subreddits).

Lemmy instances all work with each other*. Think of it like email. If I'm a Gmail user, I can still email Yahoo addresses, because Gmail, Yahoo, and all other email providers use a shared set of rules. All Lemmy instances also follow a shared set of rules (called a protocol, not that you need to know that). That means you can post to other instances, subscribe to their communities, upvote, downvote, and do all the things you can do on your instance.

The Lemmy app you use has a lot of control over how this is all laid out, so if you're finding it confusing, try different apps. As a former RIF user, I personally like Liftoff, which you can get in the Play Store, but other popular options are Jerboa, Thunder, Connect for Lemmy, wefwef, and Summit.

There's plenty more to say, but that should be enough to get started. Feel free to post questions in the comments! I may not know the answers to all of them, but I imagine others will.

*Oversimplification.

view more: next ›