Sconrad122

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I don't understand, why are last two panels identical? Printing error?

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Degoogled and upamazon'd. Don't expect a Foss-friendly environment, just a different flavor of enshittification. Also no source

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It's about whether US will do the same throw under the bus routine with Taiwan I think. China would love to know that the US won't seriously contest an attempt to invade their neighbor across the strait

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (8 children)

I'm not disputing your claim, but can you help me understand how paper straws are less usable/more hostile to people with disabilities? I'm struggling to see how the material choice would impact accessibility, but it seems like you have a pretty clear impact in mind

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, sure, so just rephrase the statement. Many workers believe working in the office justifies 25% additional compensation (80 to 100% of what they are paid today). That doesn't mean workers shouldn't be paid more, it's just capturing the delta in compensation required to justify in person work

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unethical life pro tip, depending on whether respecting others' religious traditions is part of your ethics: no mass I've ever been to has checked identity before giving out communion. If you've got an hour to burn for a free tasteless chip and a sip of wine and backwash, just walk in with mild confidence, mimic others, and mumble along with the prayers, and people will probably just assume you usually go to mass at another time or are traveling. There's no Eucharist police that's going to tackle you halfway down the aisle and throw you in an inquisition dungeon because your papers don't check out

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Instructions unclear, hid roadkill bear in Central Park

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

On first read, I assumed you were referring to literal tiger testicles

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two different scales at play. The geographic scale clearly changes in the last image, but thankfully the measurement scale (as indicated by the color bar below each picture) stays constant, which would be much more egregious in terms of making the image misleading if it did not.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are people who retire on 1/1000th of that. This man made almost a lifetime's worth of money in the same amount of time it takes most people to get a single good night's sleep. Truly unfathomable wealth hoarding behavior

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Reflective signs are specifically efficient at reflecting light back at their source and nowhere else (retroreflectivity). Obviously it's not perfect, but the fact that that cone is so narrow is part of why it looks so bright (not dissimilar from the cutoff of the LED lights you are describing). Meaning that light reflected off the roadway before reaching the sign will generally be reflected back at the roadway. With how large some vehicle grills are being built nowadays, it may be possible for a low mounted headlight to be far enough away from the driver that retroreflective signs are no longer as effectively illuminated for the driver. Truckers probably already deal with this, I haven't driven in one, but I suspect road signs are not as well illuminated for the driver as in other vehicles. We don't rely solely on retroreflectivity to make our signs visible, so it's not all or nothing, but it may be worth keeping some nominal illumination (could be like moderate flashlight levels of brightness) at driver level so we can continue to take advantage of retroreflective technology

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Accelerationism is ultimately burning the vulnerable at the stake to try and send a smoke signal, so I think it's hard to say that this is a positive development. We can hope that there is a silver lining here where corporate social media self selects itself out of the general populations' lives, but I think we probably have to be realistic about the low probability of success here and the human cost that is incurred in the meantime

view more: next ›