ThisSeriesIsFalse

joined 2 years ago
[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

How dystopian, you mean. Companies will try to replace as many jobs as possible with AI, meaning everything gets considerably worse in quality and reliability, and there won't be any new jobs to replace the old ones, leading to drastic unemployment everywhere. The only ones they won't be able to replace are the jobs that actively destroy your body from doing them. Every mainstream social media will be flooded with shitty AIs pretending to be human, so people don't form any real connections and are easier to manipulate via tweaking their AI "friends" a bit. Any government that doesn't pass Anti-AI laws will find their bureaucracy jammed by a glut of AI generated proposals. Legal trials will become a sham as any evidence you need can just be generated, no need for the truth. Our current actors will be turned into AI versions, and then every movie created by that company forevermore will use only those AIs because it's cheaper. The education system is already being completely circumvented by people generating answers to their work, so they don't learn anything. Neither humans nor AIs are ready for how hard they're trying to shove this stuff into everything.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Probably the same ratio as unicorns to leprechauns.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

"Well, WW2 is over, what'll become of the Allies now?"

The humble NATO:

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Most people buying clothes aren't looking for high fashion, they're looking for something comfortable in a colour that they like. Those who are looking for fashion tend to get clothes that are originally designed and made by a tailor, and then copied so others may wear them, importantly with the consent of the tailor. These are akin to YCH commissions, since the artist/tailor gets paid for the design.

This doesn't apply to AI image generation, as the artists are almost never asked for their consent before their work gets copied and cloned a million times over. Nor do they get any sort of compensation for their stolen work.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And they did so via slavery. Still do in some parts of the world. So their argument is still valid. Clothing people requires these tools, art does not. AI 'art' doesn't need to exist.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Just give it a little squeegee on a robot arm to run down its panel every so often

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Or the sequel, Doctor Robotnik's Ring Racers

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then clearly, chicken noodle soup is a stew. /j

Yeah, you're right, I didn't really consider those kinds of soups...

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You drink a soup, and you eat a stew.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 months ago

Except... We are punishing Russians? That's half the point of sanctions, causing economic pain to the people in order to (hopefully) compel the government of said people to play nice.

view more: ‹ prev next ›