Tin

joined 6 months ago
[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

Depends on the person. Someone who just wants a stable desktop that works? No. Someone who wants to learn how Linux works, and likes to tinker? Yes.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

The only thing I don't like about stable distros is being 3-4 versions behind on software. Back when I was using Ubuntu I used to get frustrated because I wanted to use the latest version of things like LibreOffice, but couldn't without bypassing the repos, which can cause issues down the road.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Once it's installed Arch is just as easy to use as any other distro. It's "unstable" because it's rolling release, sometimes issues crop up with bleeding-edge updates, just keep an eye on the forums before updating.

I've only had to deal with a broken system a couple of times, both were 100% my fault, and both were fixable without reinstalling. Even when something breaks it's pretty forgiving, as long as one is paying attention and not afraid of reading documentation.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I dunno, I used ubuntu (or some flavor of it) for 15 years before Arch. I will say that the first time I installed Arch, I did it solely to prove to myself that I could. After that, I fell in love with it as a daily driver for a lot of reasons. The AUR is a big one, and the fact that it's so well documented also helps. But really, once it's installed, Arch isn't any more complicated than any other distro to keep running.

I did switch to EndeavourOS, though, because once one has installed Arch the "Arch way" a few times I don't reallly see any benefit in doing it again.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Arch's package manager, pacman, manages dependencies for you and is quite robust. Arch is much simpler to run and maintain than Slackware, I think.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He would call it an XUV or something

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

“forbidden terms”

...must be that "free speech" I keep hearing about. This is obviously a first amendment issue, right?

Right?

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago

Comply but include unicode: ♀ ♂ ⚧

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pop culture is mythology. You decide what's canon.

Aside: Y'all think the Egyptians ever had arguments over which version of Horus was canon?

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Threshold is a dream that Tom Paris has. It's the only way that episode makes any sense. This is headcanon, but I'm sticking with it.

I'm aware the events are referenced in Lower Decks. Tom Paris recorded the dream in his personal log which was later published as a memoir, and the dream story was taken out of context and misunderstood.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 months ago

If the opening blows of a broader class war are very concerning to you, I guess you're on the wrong side.

[–] Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

Buy more of the perma-dye to get the spots you didn't dye because they were under your clothes. If you're going to be permanently green, go full body.

view more: next ›