V0ldek

TW: contains real chuds

read the study yourself

• > ask the commenter if it's a study or a self-interested blog post
• > they don't understand
• > pull out illustrated diagram explaining that something hosted exclusively on the website of the for-profit business all authors are affiliated with is not the same as a peer-reviewed study published in a real venue
• > they laugh and say "it's a good study sir"
• > click the link
• > it's a blog post

This is actually an accurate representation of most "gifted olympiad laureate attempting to solve a freshman CS problem on the blackboard" students I've went to uni with.

Jumps to the front after 5 seconds from the task being assigned, bluffs that the problem is trivial, tries to salvage their reasoning for 5 minutes when questioned by the tutor, turns out the theorem they said was trivial is actually false, sits down having wasted 10 minutes of everyone's time.

Misogyny is the free square, easy to forget

There's a fucking for profit that does this and it's used by the god damn USA Speaker of the House so that his son can monitor his fondling

While all the comments are correct, i.e. what the fuck is wrong with you, this is also wrong since it immediately leaves the duck unsupervised after the first trip. So really not sure what you're trying to prove here.

In my head transhumanism is this cool idea where I'd get to have a zoom function in my eye

But of course none of that could exist in our capitalist hellscape because of just all the reasons the ruling class would use it to opress the working class.

And then you find out what transhumanists actually advocate for and it's just eugenics. Like without even a tiny bit of plausible deniability. They're proud it's eugenics.

Unlike in the paragraph above, though, most LW posters held plenty of nuts in their hands before.

... I'll see myself out

Can post only if you look like this

Bwahahaha, as I said on bsky: let them do it, can't wait to use it as a cautionary tale of why full rewrites are a terrible idea during freshman programming lectures

The secret is to have cultivated a codebase so utterly shit that even LLMs can make it better by just randomly making stuff up

At least they don't get psychic damage from looking at the code

To be fair, many men see every women, including cis, as one they're allowed to abuse and all the other things you mentioned. And then it'll be her fault for being "hysterical" or something similarly dumb.