I’m not surprised by the results, but it’s hardly a fair assessment of the usefulness of AI.
It's a more than fair assessment of the claims of usefulness of AI which are more or less "fire all your devs this machine is better than them already"
V0ldek
joined 2 years ago
It's going to be your INT bonus modifier, but you can get a feat that also adds the WIS modifier
For prolonged coding sessions you do need CON saving throws, but you can get advantage from drinking coffee (once per short rest)
What’s the standard advice to give them?
It's unfortunately illegal for me to answer this question earnestly
Is this generated by a Markov chain? It's incoherent, but in a kinda amusing way?
Is this you, disc horse bot?
It's a stupid thing that
- exists only in English as far as I know, every other language puts it after the number,
- is not used consistently (since you still write 25¢ and not ¢25),
- doesn't follow the way you read it (it's "five dollars" not "dollar five").
It's one of those places where yes, the spelling rules say otherwise, but the rule is fucking stupid so anarchy it is.
I'm more irked by "less", the noun there is dollars so it should be "fewer"...
Anyway, they say it covers Node and to any question regarding Node the answer is "no", I don't need an AI to know webdev fundamentals
It seems that the test itself is generated by autoplag? At least that's how I understand the PS and one of the comments about "vibe regression" in response to an error
Chat-GPT is more powerful than anyone on earth (if you squint)
xD
No sorry, let me rephrase,
Lol, lmao
How do you even grace this with a response. Shut your eyes and loudly sing "lalalala I can't hear you"
Just the usual stuff religions have to do to maintain the façade, "this is all true but gee oh golly do NOT live your life as if it was because the obvious logical conclusions it leads to end in terrorism"
You must first read this 4500-word blogpost, and possibly one or two 3000-word follow-up blogposts”.
This, coming from LW, just has to be satire. There's no way to be this self-unaware and still remember to eat regularly.
Not doing your due dilligence during recruitment is stupid, but exploiting that is still unethical, unless you can make a case for all of those companies being evil.
Like if he directly scammed idk just OpenAI, Palantir, and Amazon then sure, he can't possibly use that money for any worse purposes.
That's wrong on both counts.
The complaints about NFTs were also that they were unethical - consumed a shitton of electricity for no reason, sustained themselves mostly by scams and rugpulls. The chief use case of crypto has always been crime and money laundering.
The complaints about AI are that it fucking sucks and results in a truly insane waste of resources towards something that doesn't solve literally any problems, like NFTs squared. The unethical aspect of it all is just a cherry on top that makes using LLMs a no-go even if it happened to kinda work for your problem.