This is such a weird take imo. We've been calling agent behavior in video games AI since forever but suddenly everyone has an issue when it's applied to LLMs.
Zormat
Frenworld was one of the bigger cutsey fascist communities on reddit, coming from 4chan. Any time you see "fren" Memes it's a pretty glaring red flag
What are you talking about? This sounds cool as hell
I've definitely seen that before but I can't remember where. Cocoon (1985) comes to mind, but I'm not sure
My love of doo wop probably didn't help
No kidding. Back in college I was kicking around the idea with my friends of dumping a few student loans for semester into bitcoin to buy quality mdma. It was like $0.50 a coin at the time.
I rest easy knowing that I would have sold it for beer money well before the price went absolutely nuts. I was never going to make real profit off of it
You should use line breaks more often.
Annika Hansen is the given name of popular Star Trek: Voyager character Seven of Nine, before she was assimilated into a cyborg hive mind.
Oh shit what game is this?
In a more diplomatic reading of your post, I'll say this: Yes, I think humans are basically incredibly powerful autocomplete engines. The distinction is that an LLM has to autocomplete a single prompt at a time, with plenty of time between the prompt and response to consider the best result, while living animals are autocompleting a continuous and endless barrage of multimodal high resolution prompts and doing it quickly enough that we can manipulate the environment (prompt generator) to some level.
Yeah biocomputers are fucking wild and put silicates to shame. The issue I have is with considering biocomputation as something that fundamentally cannot be be done by any computational engine, and as far as neural computation is understood, it's a really sophisticated statistical prediction machine
I moved here recently and for the love of God I do not understand what the hype is about.